Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22707704›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2012

Analysis of IS1236-mediated gene amplification events in Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1.

Laura E Cuff, Kathryn T Elliott, Sarah C Seaton, Maliha K Ishaq, Nicole S Laniohan, Anna C Karls, Ellen L Neidle

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ranking essential bacterial processes by speed of mutant death.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mechanisms of gene duplication and amplification.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura E CuffDepartment of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Kathryn T Elliott
Sarah C Seaton
Maliha K Ishaq
Nicole S Laniohan
Anna C Karls
Ellen L Neidle
University of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombination between insertion sequence copies can cause genetic deletion, inversion, or duplication. However, it is difficult to assess the fraction of all genomic rearrangements that involve insertion sequences. In previous gene duplication and amplification studies of Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1, an insertion sequence was evident in approximately 2% of the characterized duplication sites. Gene amplification occurs frequently in all organisms and has a significant impact on evolution, adaptation, drug resistance, cancer, and various disorders. To understand the molecular details of this important process, a previously developed system was used to analyze gene amplification in selected mutants. The current study focused on amplification events in two chromosomal regions that are near one of six copies of the only transposable element in ADP1, IS1236 (an IS3 family member). Twenty-one independent mutants were analyzed, and in contrast to previous studies of a different chromosomal region, IS1236 was involved in 86% of these events. IS1236-mediated amplification could occur through homologous recombination between insertion sequences on both sides of a duplicated region. However, this mechanism presupposes that transposition generates an appropriately positioned additional copy of IS1236. To evaluate this possibility, PCR and Southern hybridization were used to determine the chromosomal configurations of amplification mutants involving IS1236. Surprisingly, the genomic patterns were inconsistent with the hypothesis that intramolecular homologous recombination occurred between insertion sequences following an initial transposition event. These results raise a novel possibility that the gene amplification events near the IS1236 elements arise from illegitimate recombination involving transposase-mediated DNA cleavage.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsGene AmplificationGenes, BacterialAcinetobacterDNA, BacterialRecombination, GeneticTranscription, GeneticTransposasesDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable ElementsTransposases

Identifiers

PMID22707704
PMCPMC3416208
OpenAlexW2120260291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.