Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22707086›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2013

Validity of sheet-type portable monitoring device for screening obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Mina Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi Namba, Satoru Tsuiki, Masaki Nakamura, Masamichi Hayashi, Yuuki Mieno, Hiromi Imizu, Shiho Fujita, Atsushi Yoshikawa, Hiroki Sakakibara and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07432919 (Evaluation of the Diagnostic Capacity of a Smart Mattress Versus Conventional Polysomnography), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07432919 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Capacity of a Smart Mattress Versus Conventional Polysomnography

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHospital San Pedro de LogroñoRan2026 to 2028Enrolled500ConditionsObstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)ArmsIntegrated polysomnographic assessment with smart mattress.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mina KobayashiNeuropsychiatric Research Institute, Japan Somnology Center, 1-24-10 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 151-0053, Japan. kobayashi@somnology.com
Kazuyoshi Namba
Satoru Tsuiki
Masaki Nakamura
Masamichi Hayashi
Yuuki Mieno
Hiromi Imizu
Shiho Fujita
Atsushi Yoshikawa
Hiroki Sakakibara
Yuichi Inoue
Fujita Health University Hospital · JPShibuya (Japan) · JPSleep Comprehensive Care Clinic Yoyogi · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe SD-101 is a non-restrictive sheet-like medical device that measures sleep-disordered breathing using pressure sensors that can detect the gravitational alterations in the body that accompany respiratory movement. One report has described that the screening specificity of the SD-101 for mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is relatively low. The present study examines whether the accuracy of the SD-101 for OSAS screening is improved by simultaneously measuring percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2).

methodsSixty consecutive individuals with suspected OSAS consented to undergo overnight polysomnography (PSG) together with simultaneous measurements of SD-101 and SpO2 at our laboratory.

resultsThe apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) determined from PSG and the respiratory disturbance index determined from SD-101 measurements significantly correlated (SD-101 alone: r = 0.871, p < 0.0001; SD-101 with SpO2: r = 0.965, p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman plots showed a smaller dispersion for the SD-101 with SpO2 than for the SD-101 alone. The SD-101 with SpO2 detected an AHI of >15 on PSG with a sensitivity and specificity of 96.9 and 90.5 % compared with 87.5 and of 85.7 %, respectively, of the SD-101 alone.

conclusionsSimultaneously measuring SpO2 improved the accuracy of the SD-101 for OSAS screening. Furthermore, this modality appears to offer high sensitivity and specificity for detecting even moderately severe OSAS.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsAdultAgedEquipment DesignFemaleHumansJapanMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOutpatient Clinics, HospitalOxygenPolysomnographyPredictive Value of TestsSleep Apnea, ObstructiveStatistics as TopicOxygen

Identifiers

PMID22707086
OpenAlexW2014633222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.