Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22707008›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2013

Simulation of normal pelvic mobilities in building an MRI-validated biomechanical model.

Michel Cosson, C Rubod, A Vallet, J F Witz, P Dubois, M Brieu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04551859 (Concordance of Pelvic Organ Mobility Measurements Between the Finite Element Model and the Dynamic Pelvic Floor MRI in Patients Undergoing a Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04551859 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Concordance of Pelvic Organ Mobility Measurements Between the Finite Element Model and the Dynamic Pelvic Floor MRI in Patients Undergoing a Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconRan2020 to 2021Enrolled41ConditionsSacrospinofixation, Apical ProlapseArmsDynamic Pelvic Floor MRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Biomechanical trade-offs in the pelvic floor constrain the evolution of the human birth canal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michel CossonGynaecology Department, Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU, 59000, Lille, France. michel.cosson@chru-lille.fr
C Rubod
A Vallet
J F Witz
P Dubois
M Brieu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThree-dimensional modeling of feminine pelvic mobility is difficult because the sustaining system is not well understood and ligaments are especially difficult to identify on imaging.

methodsWe built a 3-D numerical model of the pelvic cavity, based on magnetic resonance (MR) images and knowledge about anatomy and validated it systematically.

resultsThe quantitative results of this model allow for the non-destructive localization of the structures involved in pelvic statics. With a better configuration of the functional pelvis and topological criteria, we can obtain a coherent anatomical and functional model.

conclusionsThis model is the first step in developing a tool to localize and characterize pelvic imbalance in patients.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFinite Element AnalysisHumansLigamentsPelvisYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.