ArticleVirus genes2012
CTCF and Sp1 interact with the Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 internal repeat elements.
Article in Virus genes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Herpesviruses maintain a dynamic balance between latency and productive infection. This is a complex process regulated by viral and cellular factors. We have developed a Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV-68) model system in which to study mechanisms underlying balance between latency and lytic infection. We have generated an epithelial cell line that carries MHV-68 in a tightly latent form by using a bacterial artificial chromosome clone of the virus genome with a mutation in the MHV-68 major lytic R transactivator gene. Complementation of this defect in trans by transfection with a plasmid encoding R transactivator initiated and restored the productive cycle. This cell line model was used to investigate transcription factor occupancy (CCCTC binding factor [CTCF] and Sp1) of the two internal repeat elements in the viral genome during latency and reactivation using chromatin immunoprecipitation. Our results show that CTCF can bind to the 40-bp and the 100-bp repeat sequences during latency, whereas binding is reduced upon reactivation. In contrast, Sp1 only bound to the 100-bp repeat after reactivation. Our results indicate that the large internal repeat sequences in MHV-68 have different functions. We hypothesise that the 40-bp repeat may be involved in regulation of gene expression during the maintenance of latency, while the 100-bp repeat domain may be involved in regulation of the lytic cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.