ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2012
An improved structural characterisation of reduced French bean plastocyanin based on NMR data and local-elevation molecular dynamics simulation.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sparse labeling of proteins: structural characterization from long range constraints.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2014Review
- On the calculation of ³Jαβ-coupling constants for side chains in proteins.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deriving structural information about a protein from NMR experimental data is still a non-trivial challenge to computational biochemistry. This is because of the low ratio of the number of independent observables to the number of molecular degrees of freedom, the approximations involved in the different relationships between particular observable quantities and molecular conformation, and the averaged character of the experimental data. For example, protein (3)J-coupling data are seldom used for structure refinement because of the multiple-valuedness and limited accuracy of the Karplus relationship linking a (3)J-coupling to a torsional angle. Moreover, sampling of the large conformational space is still problematic. Using the 99-residue protein plastocyanin as an example we investigated whether use of a thermodynamically calibrated force field, inclusion of solvent degrees of freedom, and application of adaptive local-elevation sampling that accounts for conformational averaging produces a more realistic representation of the ensemble of protein conformations than standard single-structure refinement in a non-explicit solvent using restraints that do not account for averaging and are partly based on non-observed data. Yielding better agreement with observed experimental data, the protein conformational ensemble is less restricted than when using standard single-structure refinement techniques, which are likely to yield a picture of the protein which is too rigid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.