Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22706618›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2013

Underreporting in pharmacovigilance: an intervention for Italian GPs (Emilia-Romagna region).

Chiara Biagi, Nicola Montanaro, Elena Buccellato, Giuseppe Roberto, Alberto Vaccheri, Domenico Motola

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02134587 (Implementation of a Hospital Pharmacovigilance Service and Comparison of Algorithms for Adverse Drug Reaction Causality Assessment), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02134587 nacompletednot on this map

Implementation of a Hospital Pharmacovigilance Service and Comparison of Algorithms for Adverse Drug Reaction Causality Assessment

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita FilhoRan2012 to 2014Enrolled203ConditionsAdverse Drug ReactionArmsMultifaceted educational intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Improving adverse drug event reporting by healthcare professionals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Post-finasteride syndrome - a true clinical entity?International journal of impotence research · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Headache as an Adverse Reaction to the Use of Medication in the Elderly: A Pharmacovigilance Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chiara BiagiDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 48, Postal Code 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Nicola Montanaro
Elena Buccellato
Giuseppe Roberto
Alberto Vaccheri
Domenico Motola

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUnderreporting is a major limitation of spontaneous reporting systems for suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Several interventions to increase the ADR reporting rate have been proposed, but their efficacy remains poorly investigated.

methodsThis was a questionnaire study aimed at assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of general practitioners (GPs) regarding ADR reporting and at evaluating whether a monthly e-mail-based newsletter on drug safety could affect the rate and the quality of the ADR reports submitted by these GPs. Three local health authorities (LHAs) of the Emilia-Romagna region were chosen on the basis of their ADR reporting rate during the period preceding the study: Rimini (high), Ferrara (average), and Piacenza (low reporting rate). All GPs (n = 737) associated with these three LHAs were recruited. The pooled number of ADR reports sent by GPs in the remaining seven LHAs of the region was used as controls. The study covered a period of 3 years and was divided into: (1) identification of the reasons leading to underreporting through a questionnaire (Phase I); (2) the intervention, i.e., sending a newsletter for a 10-month period (Phase II); (3) evaluation of the intervention outcomes during the 10 months following the period in which the newsletter had been received (Phase III).

resultsAmong GPs involved, 22.8 % returned the questionnaire. Over 94 % of the respondents considered the spontaneous reporting of suspected ADRs to be part of their professional obligations, but only 6.5 % had submitted at least one report in the previous 6 months. Following the completion of Phase II, the overall number of reports coming from the LHAs subjected to the intervention rose by 49.2 % compared to 2009, while the number of reports coming from the control LHAs increased by 8.8 %. Rimini and Piacenza showed a 200 % increase in the number of ADR reports submitted by GPs, while the number of ADR reported submitted by the control group decreased by 25.5 %. In 2011, the number of overall ADRs reports from the LHAs subjected to the intervention decreased by 6.8 %; this decrease reached 50.0 % of the GPs. Control HLAs showed an overall decline of 4.3 %, while the total number of ADRs from GPs increased by 63.3 %. Ferrara was excluded from the analysis due to confounding factors.

conclusionsThe periodic e-mail update on the safety of drugs represents an effective and inexpensive way to raise the awareness of GPs on the importance of spontaneous ADR reporting. Since the outcome of the intervention seemed to disappear after the intervention was stopped, there appears to be a need to adopt a policy of regular updates and educational strategies for health professionals.

Indexed as

Professional RoleAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAgedFemaleGeneral PractitionersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPharmacovigilanceSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.