Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22706095›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cancer biology2012

Linking epithelial-to-mesenchymal-transition and epigenetic modifications.

Sonja C Stadler, C David Allis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cancer biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sonja C StadlerInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 27, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. Sonja.Stadler@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
C David Allis
Rockefeller University · USUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

Dynamic Regulation of Methyl-arginine and Citrulline in Breast Cancer CellsR01GM098870 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI ALLIS, CHARLES DAVID · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098870NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM098870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer, as well as other human disorders, has long been considered to result from the consequence of genetic mutations in key regulatory genes that reside in pathways controlling proliferation, cellular differentiation, DNA damage and repair. In the case of cancer, mutations are well documented to arise in key oncogenes and critically important tumor-suppressor genes as part of the disease progression process. In addition to more accepted, genetic mutations, a rapidly increasing body of evidence supports the general view that profound alterations also occur in 'epigenes', whose products serve to define the 'epigenetic landscape' of tumor cells. Aberrant changes in epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation, histone modifications and expression of micro RNAs play an important role in cancer and contribute to malignant transitions. Here we review recent studies linking epigenetic mechanisms to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition as defined in normal processes, as well as abnormal transitions that lead to oncogensis.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAntineoplastic AgentsDNA MethylationEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHistonesHumansMicroRNAsNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsHistonesMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID22706095
PMCPMC3445725
OpenAlexW1981297055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.