Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22706011›Full record

ReviewAIDS (London, England)2012

The design and evaluation of HIV-1 vaccines.

Kevin O Saunders, Rebecca S Rudicell, Gary J Nabel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIDS (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. HIV-1 vaccines: challenges and new perspectives.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. New clinical trial designs for HIV vaccine evaluation.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2013
    Review
  17. Translational research insights from completed HIV vaccine efficacy trials.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2013
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Human dendritic cell subsets in vaccination.Current opinion in immunology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin O SaundersVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-3005, USA.
Rebecca S Rudicell
Gary J Nabel

Funding

HIV/AIDS Vaccine DevelopmentZ01AI005002 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI NABEL, GARY J · 2002 to 2008
$3.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AI005002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is renewed optimism that the goal of developing a highly effective AIDS vaccine is attainable. The HIV-1 vaccine field has seen its first trial of a vaccine candidate that prevents infection. Although modest in efficacy, this finding, along with the recent discovery that the human immune system can produce broadly neutralizing antibodies capable of inhibiting greater than 90% of circulating viruses, provides a guide for the rational design of vaccines and protection by passive immunization. Together, these findings will help shape the next generation of HIV vaccines.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDrug DesignHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeVaccines, SyntheticAIDS VaccinesVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID22706011
PMCPMC7480282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.