Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22705669›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2012

Comparative studies of gene expression and the evolution of gene regulation.

Irene Gallego Romero, Ilya Ruvinsky, Yoav Gilad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 274 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
274citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

274 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Discriminating models of trait evolution.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

214 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irene Gallego RomeroDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Ilya Ruvinsky
Yoav Gilad

Funding

CORE: ADMINISTRATIVEP50GM081892 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI WHITE, KEVIN P. · 2008 to 2013
$15.9M
Natural Selection on Gene Regulation in HumansR01GM077959 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GILAD, YOAV · 2006 to 2014
$2.9M
The evolution of human specific regulatory pathwaysR01GM084996 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GILAD, YOAV · 2010 to 2013
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM077959NIGMS NIH HHS GM084996NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM081892NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077959NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084996Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypothesis that differences in gene regulation have an important role in speciation and adaptation is more than 40 years old. With the advent of new sequencing technologies, we are able to characterize and study gene expression levels and associated regulatory mechanisms in a large number of individuals and species at an unprecedented resolution and scale. We have thus gained new insights into the evolutionary pressures that shape gene expression levels and have developed an appreciation for the relative importance of evolutionary changes in different regulatory genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. The current challenge is to link gene regulatory changes to adaptive evolution of complex phenotypes. Here we mainly focus on comparative studies in primates and how they are complemented by studies in model organisms.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEpigenesis, GeneticGenetic SpeciationModels, GeneticAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsGene Expression RegulationPhysiology, ComparativePrimatesSelection, GeneticSpecies SpecificityTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22705669
PMCPMC4034676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.