ArticleCurrent biology : CB2012
Stochastic, adaptive sampling of information by microvilli in fly photoreceptors.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synaptic high-frequency jumping synchronises vision to high-speed behaviour.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Investments in photoreceptors compete with investments in optics to determine eye design.eLife · 2026Article
- A recurrent neural circuit in Drosophila temporally sharpens visual inputs.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Divisive normalization processors in the early visual system of the Drosophila brain.Biological cybernetics · 2023Article
- Article
- Retinal TRP channels: Cell-type-specific regulators of retinal homeostasis and multimodal integration.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2023Review
- Article
- Binocular mirror-symmetric microsaccadic sampling enablesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Article
- Speed of phototransduction in the microvillus regulates the accuracy and bandwidth of the rhabdomeric photoreceptor.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Suppression of Gq and PLC gene expression has a small effect on quantum bumps in vivo in Periplaneta americana.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020Article
- Sparse identification of contrast gain control in the fruit fly photoreceptor and amacrine cell layer.Journal of mathematical neuroscience · 2020Article
- CaThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Modeling and simulation of phototransduction cascade in vertebrate rod photoreceptors.BMC ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Unconventional Roles of Opsins.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2017Review
- Point process analysis of noise in early invertebrate vision.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Article
- How a fly photoreceptor samples light information in time.The Journal of physiology · 2017Review
- A biomimetic fly photoreceptor model elucidates how stochastic adaptive quantal sampling provides a large dynamic range.The Journal of physiology · 2017Review
- Calcium signalling in Drosophila photoreceptors measured with GCaMP6f.Cell calcium · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn fly photoreceptors, light is focused onto a photosensitive waveguide, the rhabdomere, consisting of tens of thousands of microvilli. Each microvillus is capable of generating elementary responses, quantum bumps, in response to single photons using a stochastically operating phototransduction cascade. Whereas much is known about the cascade reactions, less is known about how the concerted action of the microvilli population encodes light changes into neural information and how the ultrastructure and biochemical machinery of photoreceptors of flies and other insects evolved in relation to the information sampling and processing they perform.
resultsWe generated biophysically realistic fly photoreceptor models, which accurately simulate the encoding of visual information. By comparing stochastic simulations with single cell recordings from Drosophila photoreceptors, we show how adaptive sampling by 30,000 microvilli captures the temporal structure of natural contrast changes. Following each bump, individual microvilli are rendered briefly (~100-200 ms) refractory, thereby reducing quantum efficiency with increasing intensity. The refractory period opposes saturation, dynamically and stochastically adjusting availability of microvilli (bump production rate: sample rate), whereas intracellular calcium and voltage adapt bump amplitude and waveform (sample size). These adapting sampling principles result in robust encoding of natural light changes, which both approximates perceptual contrast constancy and enhances novel events under different light conditions, and predict information processing across a range of species with different visual ecologies.
conclusionsThese results clarify why fly photoreceptors are structured the way they are and function as they do, linking sensory information to sensory evolution and revealing benefits of stochasticity for neural information processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.