Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22704990›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2012

Stochastic, adaptive sampling of information by microvilli in fly photoreceptors.

Zhuoyi Song, Marten Postma, Stephen A Billings, Daniel Coca, Roger C Hardie, Mikko Juusola

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Binocular mirror-symmetric microsaccadic sampling enablesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Suppression of Gq and PLC gene expression has a small effect on quantum bumps in vivo in Periplaneta americana.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. CaThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Unconventional Roles of Opsins.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Zhuoyi SongDepartment of Biomedical Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Marten Postma
Stephen A Billings
Daniel Coca
Roger C Hardie
Mikko Juusola
University of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D001900/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D007585/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F012071/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G006865/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H013849/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council E19850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn fly photoreceptors, light is focused onto a photosensitive waveguide, the rhabdomere, consisting of tens of thousands of microvilli. Each microvillus is capable of generating elementary responses, quantum bumps, in response to single photons using a stochastically operating phototransduction cascade. Whereas much is known about the cascade reactions, less is known about how the concerted action of the microvilli population encodes light changes into neural information and how the ultrastructure and biochemical machinery of photoreceptors of flies and other insects evolved in relation to the information sampling and processing they perform.

resultsWe generated biophysically realistic fly photoreceptor models, which accurately simulate the encoding of visual information. By comparing stochastic simulations with single cell recordings from Drosophila photoreceptors, we show how adaptive sampling by 30,000 microvilli captures the temporal structure of natural contrast changes. Following each bump, individual microvilli are rendered briefly (~100-200 ms) refractory, thereby reducing quantum efficiency with increasing intensity. The refractory period opposes saturation, dynamically and stochastically adjusting availability of microvilli (bump production rate: sample rate), whereas intracellular calcium and voltage adapt bump amplitude and waveform (sample size). These adapting sampling principles result in robust encoding of natural light changes, which both approximates perceptual contrast constancy and enhances novel events under different light conditions, and predict information processing across a range of species with different visual ecologies.

conclusionsThese results clarify why fly photoreceptors are structured the way they are and function as they do, linking sensory information to sensory evolution and revealing benefits of stochasticity for neural information processing.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsDrosophilaFeedback, PhysiologicalMicrovilliModels, BiologicalPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebrateStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID22704990
PMCPMC3420010
OpenAlexW2149089837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.