Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22704741›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of preventive medicine2012

Using mHealth technology to enhance self-monitoring for weight loss: a randomized trial.

Lora E Burke, Mindi A Styn, Susan M Sereika, Molly B Conroy, Lei Ye, Karen Glanz, Mary Ann Sevick, Linda J Ewing

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of preventive medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 153 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00277771 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Self-Monitoring in Weight Loss With Technology

TypeinterventionalSponsorLora BurkeRan2006 to 2010Enrolled210ConditionsObesity, OverweightArmsStandard behavioral treatment (SBT) for weight loss, SBT for weight loss using a PDA, SBT for weight loss using a PDA with feedback messages
NCT02381262 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Fitbit / Healthy Weight Management Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLancaster General HospitalRan2015 to 2019Enrolled213ConditionsObesity, Bariatric SurgeryArmsFitbit
NCT03191565 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The mDIARY Study: Using Smartphones for Daily Selfmonitoring of Skilluse and Outcome in Dialectical Behavior Therapy With Borderline Personality Disorder: A Combined RCT and Timeseries Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion of Southern DenmarkRan2017 to 2020Enrolled78ConditionsBorderline Personality Disorder, Emotional Instability, Skill, CopingArmsPaper diary sheet, Monsenso DBT-app and IT monitoring program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Guideline
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lora E BurkeDepartment of Health and Community Systems, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA. lbu100@pitt.edu
Mindi A Styn
Susan M Sereika
Molly B Conroy
Lei Ye
Karen Glanz
Mary Ann Sevick
Linda J Ewing

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE: BPCAUL1RR024153 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2006 to 2011
$73.9M
WITHIN SUBJ VARIABILITY IN MEASUREMENTS DRUG METABOL ENZYMES IN HLTY SUBJM01RR000056 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LEVINE, ARTHUR S · 1985 to 2006
$29.2M
Core--Statistics and Data ManagementP30NR003924 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ERLEN, JUDITH A · 1994 to 2008
$3.1M
Improving Self-Monitoring in Weight Loss with TechnologyR01DK071817 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BURKE, LORA EMILIE · 2005 to 2010
$2.5M
Long-term changes in weight and adipokines and the associations with genetic variK24NR010742 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BURKE, LORA EMILIE · 2008 to 2010
$393k
NCRR NIH HHS 5M01-RR000056NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000056NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024153NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK071817NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK071817NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK071817-04S1NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK071817-05S1NINR NIH HHS K24 NR010742NINR NIH HHS K24-NR010742NINR NIH HHS P30 NR003924NINR NIH HHS P30-NR03924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-monitoring for weight loss has traditionally been performed with paper diaries. Technologic advances could reduce the burden of self-monitoring and provide feedback to enhance adherence. PURPOSE: To determine if self-monitoring diet using a PDA only or the PDA with daily tailored feedback (PDA+feedback [FB]), was superior to using a paper diary on weight loss and maintenance.

designThe Self-Monitoring and Recording Using Technology (SMART) Trial was a 24-month randomized clinical trial; participants were randomly assigned to one of three self-monitoring groups. SETTING/

participantsFrom 2006 to 2008, a total of 210 overweight/obese adults (84.8% female, 78.1% white) were recruited from the community. Data were analyzed in 2011.

interventionParticipants received standard behavioral treatment for weight loss that included dietary and physical activity goals, encouraged the use of self-monitoring, and was delivered in group sessions.

main outcome measuresPercentage weight change at 24 months, adherence to self-monitoring over time.

resultsStudy retention was 85.6%. The mean percentage weight loss at 24 months was not different among groups (paper diary: -1.94%, 95% CI = -3.88, 0.01; PDA: -1.38%, 95% CI= -3.38, 0.62; PDA+FB: -2.32%, 95% CI= -4.29, -0.35); only the PDA+FB group (p=0.02) demonstrated a significant loss. For adherence to self-monitoring, there was a time-by-treatment group interaction between the combined PDA groups and the paper diary group (p=0.03) but no difference between PDA and PDA+FB groups (p=0.49). Across all groups, weight loss was greater for those who were adherent ≥60% versus <30% of the time (p<0.001).

conclusionsPDA+FB use resulted in a small weight loss at 24 months; PDA use resulted in greater adherence to dietary self-monitoring over time. However, for sustained weight loss, adherence to self-monitoring is more important than the method used to self-monitor. A daily feedback message delivered remotely enhanced adherence and improved weight loss, which suggests that technology can play a role in improving weight loss.

trial registrationThis study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT00277771.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldFeedback, PsychologicalAdultDietEnergy IntakeExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPennsylvaniaSelf CareSelf ReportWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID22704741
PMCPMC3563396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.