Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22704644›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2012

Visual sensory processing deficits in schizophrenia: is there anything to the magnocellular account?

Edmund C Lalor, Pierfilippo De Sanctis, Menahem I Krakowski, John J Foxe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The Correlation of PANSS Scores and P100 Latency in Patients with Schizophrenia and Migrene Hedache Using Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPS) According to Gender and Age.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Signal Propagation in the Human Visual Pathways: An Effective Connectivity Analysis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  11. Visual masking & schizophrenia.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Edmund C LalorThe Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Road, Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA. edlalor@tcd.ie
Pierfilippo De Sanctis
Menahem I Krakowski
John J Foxe
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USTrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Sensory Processing and Integration in AutismR01MH085322 · NIMH · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI FOXE, JOHN J, MOLHOLM, SOPHIE · 2009 to 2013
$2.8M
The Neurophysiology of Violence in SchizohphreniaR01MH074767 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI KRAKOWSKI, MENAHEM I · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS MH74767NIMH NIH HHS MH85322NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074767NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual processing studies have repeatedly shown impairment in patients with schizophrenia compared to healthy controls. Electroencephalography (EEG) and, specifically, visual evoked potential (VEP) studies have identified an early marker of this impairment in the form of a decrement in the P1 component of the VEP in patients and their clinically unaffected first-degree relatives. Much behavioral and neuroimaging research has implicated specific dysfunction of either the subcortical magnocellular pathway or the cortical visual dorsal stream in this impairment. In this study, EEG responses were obtained to the contrast modulation of checkerboard stimuli using the VESPA (Visual Evoked Spread Spectrum Analysis) method. This was done for a high contrast condition and, in order to bias the stimuli towards the magnocellular pathway, a low contrast condition. Standard VEPs were also obtained using high contrast pattern reversing checkerboards. Responses were measured using high-density electrical scalp recordings in 29 individuals meeting DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia and in 18 control subjects. Replicating previous research, a large (Cohen's d=1.11) reduction in the P1 component of the VEP was seen in patients when compared with controls with no corresponding difference in the VESPA response to high contrast stimuli. In addition, the low-contrast VESPA displayed no difference between patients and controls. Furthermore, no differences were seen between patients and controls for the C1 components of either the VEP or the high-contrast VESPA. Based on the differing acquisition methods between VEP and VESPA, we discuss these results in terms of contrast gain control and the possibility of dysfunction at the cortical level with initial afferent activity into V1 along the magnocellular pathway being intact when processing is biased towards that pathway using low contrast stimuli.

Indexed as

AdultContrast SensitivityElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptual DisordersPhotic StimulationReaction TimeROC CurveSchizophreniaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22704644
PMCPMC3393820
OpenAlexW2129604613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.