ArticleAnnals of intensive care2012
Variability of insulin sensitivity during the first 4 days of critical illness: implications for tight glycemic control.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04651842 (Impact of Acute Insulin Resistance on Myocardial Blush in Non- Diabetic Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Acute Insulin Resistance on Myocardial Blush in Non- Diabetic Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Individualised versus conventional glucose control in critically-ill patients: the CONTROLING study-a randomized clinical trial.Intensive care medicine · 2021Trial
- Second pilot trials of the STAR-Liege protocol for tight glycemic control in critically ill patients.Biomedical engineering online · 2012Trial
- The relationship between hyperglycaemia on admission and patient outcome is modified by hyperlactatemia and diabetic status: a retrospective analysis of the eICU collaborative research database.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Estimating Enhanced Endogenous Glucose Production in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Severe Insulin Resistance.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022Article
- A Hybrid Automata Approach for Monitoring the Patient in the Loop in Artificial Pancreas Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Estimating Increased EGP During Stress Response in Critically Ill Patients.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021Article
- Insulin sensitivity in critically ill patients: are women more insulin resistant?Annals of intensive care · 2021Article
- Capacity of Infusion Lines for Insulin Adsorption: Effect of Flow Rate on Total Adsorption.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021Article
- Impact of Acute Insulin Resistance on Myocardial Blush in Non-Diabetic Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Increased insulin resistance in intensive care: longitudinal retrospective analysis of glycaemic control patients in a New Zealand ICU.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2021Article
- Algorithm Maxima for Intravenous Insulin Infusion.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2020Article
- Hypoglycemia Prevention by Algorithm Design During Intravenous Insulin Infusion.Current diabetes reports · 2018Review
- Next-generation, personalised, model-based critical care medicine: a state-of-the art review of in silico virtual patient models, methods, and cohorts, and how to validation them.Biomedical engineering online · 2018Review
- Nutrition delivery of a model-based ICU glycaemic control system.Annals of intensive care · 2018Article
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring Measures Can Be Used for Glycemic Control in the ICU: An In-Silico Study.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2018Article
- Autoregressive Modeling of Drift and Random Error to Characterize a Continuous Intravascular Glucose Monitoring Sensor.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2018Article
- Hypoglycemia Reduction Strategies in the ICU.Current diabetes reports · 2017Review
- Comparative Simulation Study of Glucose Control Methods Designed for Use in the Intensive Care Unit Setting via a Novel Controller Scoring Metric.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2017Article
- Traversing the valley of glycemic control despair.Critical care (London, England) · 2017Article
- Untangling glycaemia and mortality in critical care.Critical care (London, England) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective tight glycemic control (TGC) can improve outcomes in critical care patients, but it is difficult to achieve consistently. Insulin sensitivity defines the metabolic balance between insulin concentration and insulin-mediated glucose disposal. Hence, variability of insulin sensitivity can cause variable glycemia. This study quantifies and compares the daily evolution of insulin sensitivity level and variability for critical care patients receiving TGC.
methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of data from the SPRINT TGC study involving patients admitted to a mixed medical-surgical ICU between August 2005 and May 2007. Only patients who commenced TGC within 12 hours of ICU admission and spent at least 24 hours on the SPRINT protocol were included (N = 164). Model-based insulin sensitivity (SI) was identified each hour. Absolute level and hour-to-hour percent changes in SI were assessed on cohort and per-patient bases. Levels and variability of SI were compared over time on 24-hour and 6-hour timescales for the first 4 days of ICU stay.
resultsCohort and per-patient median SI levels increased by 34% and 33% (p < 0.001) between days 1 and 2 of ICU stay. Concomitantly, cohort and per-patient SI variability decreased by 32% and 36% (p < 0.001). For 72% of the cohort, median SI on day 2 was higher than on day 1. The day 1-2 results are the only clear, statistically significant trends across both analyses. Analysis of the first 24 hours using 6-hour blocks of SI data showed that most of the improvement in insulin sensitivity level and variability seen between days 1 and 2 occurred during the first 12-18 hours of day 1.
conclusionsCritically ill patients have significantly lower and more variable insulin sensitivity on day 1 than later in their ICU stay and particularly during the first 12 hours. This rapid improvement is likely due to the decline of counter-regulatory hormones as the acute phase of critical illness progresses. Clinically, these results suggest that while using TGC protocols with patients during their first few days of ICU stay, extra care should be afforded. Increased measurement frequency, higher target glycemic bands, conservative insulin dosing, and modulation of carbohydrate nutrition should be considered to minimize safely the outcome glycemic variability and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.