Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22703301›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2012

A nucleotide-gated molecular pore selects sulfotransferase substrates.

Ian Cook, Ting Wang, Charles N Falany, Thomas S Leyh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Enzyme Kinetics of PAPS-Sulfotransferase.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Allosteres to regulate neurotransmitter sulfonation.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The NSAID allosteric site of human cytosolic sulfotransferases.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Controlling Sulfuryl-Transfer Biology.Cell chemical biology · 2016
    Article
  15. Design and Interpretation of Human Sulfotransferase 1A1 Assays.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The allosteric binding sites of sulfotransferase 1A1.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ian CookDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461-1926, USA.
Ting Wang
Charles N Falany
Thomas S Leyh
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

SULFATE ADENYLATION-BIOCHEMISTRY &ENZYMOLOGYR01GM054469 · NIGMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI LEYH, THOMAS S. · 1995 to 2011
$4.7M
HUMAN CYTOSOLIC SULFOTRANSFERASESR01GM038953 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FALANY, CHARLES N · 1992 to 2013
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM389532NIGMS NIH HHS GM54469NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM038953NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human SULT2A1 is one of two predominant sulfotransferases in liver and catalyzes transfer of the sulfuryl moiety (-SO(3)) from activated sulfate (PAPS, 3'-phosphoadenosine 5-phosphosulfate) to hundreds of acceptors (metabolites and xenobiotics). Sulfation recodes the biologic activity of acceptors by altering their receptor interactions. The molecular basis on which these enzymes select and sulfonate specific acceptors from complex mixtures of competitors in vivo is a long-standing issue in the SULT field. Raloxifene, a synthetic steroid used in the prevention of osteoporosis, and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), a ubiquitous steroid precusor, are reported to be sulfated efficiently by SULT2A1 in vitro, yet unlike DHEA, raloxifene is not sulfated in vivo. This selectivity was explored in initial rate and equilibrium binding studies that demonstrate pronounced binding antisynergy (21-fold) between PAPS and raloxifene, but not DHEA. Analysis of crystal structures suggests that PAP binding restricts access to the acceptor-binding pocket by restructuring a nine-residue segment of the pocket edge that constricts the active site opening, or "pore", that sieves substrates on the basis of their geometries. In silico docking predicts that raloxifene, which is considerably larger than DHEA, can bind only to the unliganded (open) enzyme, whereas DHEA binds both the open and closed forms. The predictions of these structures with regard to substrate binding are tested using equilibrium and pre-steady-state ligand binding studies, and the results confirm that a nucleotide-driven isomerization controls access to the acceptor-binding pocket and plays an important role in substrate selection by SULT2A1 and possibly other sulfotransferases.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsComputer SimulationDehydroepiandrosteroneKineticsMolecular Docking SimulationPhosphoadenosine PhosphosulfateProtein BindingRaloxifene HydrochlorideRecombinant ProteinsSubstrate SpecificitySulfotransferasesalcohol sulfotransferaseBone Density Conservation AgentsDehydroepiandrosteronePhosphoadenosine PhosphosulfateRaloxifene HydrochlorideRecombinant ProteinsSulfotransferases

Identifiers

PMID22703301
PMCPMC3448010
OpenAlexW2003112936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.