ReviewDrug safety2012
Safety and tolerability of antiepileptic drug treatment in children with epilepsy.
Review in Drug safety, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interactions Between Antiepileptic and Antibiotic Drugs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Dosing Implications.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2019Pooled it
- Adjunctive Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Pediatric Patients with Focal Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.CNS drugs · 2018Pooled it
- Pregnanolone-Based Prodrugs as a Strategy for Neuroprotective Drug-Like Compounds: Pregnanolone Pyroglutamate and Its Age‑dependent Anticonvulsant Effects in the 6-hz Seizure Model in Immature Rats.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- The effect of erythromycin and clarithromycin versus azithromycin on serum valproate concentration.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022Article
- Telehealth in pediatric epilepsy care: A rapid transition during the COVID-19 pandemic.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2020Review
- Bridging the childhood epilepsy treatment gap in northern Nigeria (BRIDGE): Rationale and design of pre-clinical trial studies.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2019Article
- Association of Child Neurology-Indian Epilepsy Society Consensus Document on Parental Counseling of Children with Epilepsy.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2019Review
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Topiramate versus Phenobarbital in the Treatment of Children with Febrile Seizure.Iranian journal of child neurology · 2019Article
- Antiepileptic drug use in Italian children over a decade.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Article
- Protocol for a prospective observational study of adverse drug reactions of anti-epileptic drugs in children in the UK.BMJ paediatrics open · 2017Article
- Thirty Years of Orphan Drug Legislation and the Development of Drugs to Treat Rare Seizure Conditions: A Cross Sectional Analysis.PloS one · 2016Observational
- Antiepileptic Drug Treatment in Children with Epilepsy.CNS drugs · 2015Review
- Anti-epileptic effects of neuropeptide Y gene transfection into the rat brain.Neural regeneration research · 2013Article
- Electroacupuncture-induced attenuation of experimental epilepsy: a comparative evaluation of acupoints and stimulation parameters.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of treating epilepsy is to control or at least decrease seizures without producing unacceptable adverse effects that impair quality of life. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been considered amongst the drugs most frequently associated with fatal suspected adverse drug reactions. Physicians must therefore be as familiar with safety and tolerability data of AEDs as they are with the expected therapeutic effects. AEDs may cause dose-related adverse effects (i.e. drowsiness, fatigue, dizziness, blurry vision and incoordination) that, in most cases, may be obviated by lowering the dosage, reducing the number of drugs or switching to a better tolerated AED. AEDs also have the potential of precipitating idiosyncratic adverse effects (i.e. serious cutaneous, haematological and hepatic events), which are more common in children and usually require withdrawal of the AED. Although occurrence of idiosyncratic adverse effects can only rarely be predicted or prevented, there are known risk factors that can help in identifying patients at high risk. Occurrence of an idiosyncratic event in a close relative, a concomitant autoimmune disease, co-treatment with specific drugs, history of a previous allergic drug reaction, starting treatment with high doses and rapid titration have all been associated with a higher risk of idiosyncratic adverse effects. New AEDs have been developed in the last two decades with the aim of improving the benefit-risk balance of AED therapy. Available evidence suggests that the newer AEDs are no more effective but may be somewhat better tolerated than older molecules. We performed a literature review with the aim of evaluating safety and tolerability of second- and third-generation AEDs in children. A PubMed search was conducted with the purpose of identifying English-language studies published between 1 January 1989 and 1 January 2011 that reported any adverse event having occurred in children with epilepsy in whom second- and third-generation AEDs were administered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.