Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22701866›Full record

ArticleAsia Pacific allergy2012

Management of chronic urticaria in Asia: 2010 AADV consensus guidelines.

Steven K W Chow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia Pacific allergy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Insights into urticaria in pediatric and adult populations and its management with fexofenadine hydrochloride.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2022
    Review
  6. Risk Factors for Acute Urticaria in Central California.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Diagnosis and treatment of urticaria in primary care.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Chronic urticaria and use of statins.Asia Pacific allergy · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven K W ChowThe KL Skin Centre, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia.
Hospital Kuala Lumpur · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This guideline is a result of a consensus reached during the 19th Asian-Australasian Regional Conference of Dermatology by the Asian Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Study Group in collaboration with the League of Asian Dermatological Societies in 2010. Urticaria has a profound impact on the quality of life in Asia and the need for effective treatment is required. In line with the EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF/WAO guideline for the management of urticaria the recommended first-line treatment is new generation, non-sedating H1-antihistamines. If standard dosing is ineffective, increasing the dosage up to four-fold is recommended. For patients who do not respond to a four-fold increase in dosage of non-sedating H1-antihistamines, it is recommended that therapies such as H2-antihistamine, leukotriene antagonist, and cyclosporine A should be added to the antihistamine treatment. In the choice of second-line treatment, both their costs and risk/benefit profiles are the most important considerations.

Indexed as

AsiaConsensusGuidelineTreatmentUrticariaWheal

Identifiers

PMID22701866
PMCPMC3345329
OpenAlexW2146269085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.