Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22701665›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Circulating DNA: diagnostic tool and predictive marker for overall survival of NSCLC patients.

Raquel Catarino, Ana Coelho, António Araújo, Mónica Gomes, Augusto Nogueira, Carlos Lopes, Rui Medeiros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Circulating Cell-free DNA as a Prognostic Biomarker in Patients with Advanced ALK+ Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Global Phase III ALEX Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Prognosis of Liquid Biopsy in Cancer Immunotherapy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raquel CatarinoMolecular Oncology Group Investigation Center, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Porto, Portugal. raquelcatarino@yahoo.com
Ana Coelho
António Araújo
Mónica Gomes
Augusto Nogueira
Carlos Lopes
Rui Medeiros

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of our study was to determine whether the amounts of circulating DNA (cDNA) could discriminate between NSCLC patients and healthy individuals and assess its value as a prognostic marker of this disease.

methodsWe conducted a study of 309 individuals and the cDNA levels were assessed through real-time PCR methodology.

resultsWe found increased cDNA levels in NSCLC patients compared to control individuals. We also found a decreased overall survival time in patients presenting high cDNA levels, when compared to lower cDNA concentrations.

conclusionsQuantification of cDNA may be a good tool for NSCLC detection with potential for clinical applicability.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDNADNA PrimersFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPortugalReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionStatistics, NonparametricTelomeraseBiomarkers, TumorDNADNA PrimersTelomerase

Identifiers

PMID22701665
PMCPMC3373551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.