Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22701625›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Uncoupled embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues compromise blastocyst development after somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Séverine A Degrelle, Florence Jaffrezic, Evelyne Campion, Kim-Anh Lê Cao, Daniel Le Bourhis, Christophe Richard, Nathalie Rodde, Renaud Fleurot, Robin E Everts, Jérôme Lecardonnel and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epigenetic Reprogramming and Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Séverine A DegrelleINRA, UMR 1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Florence Jaffrezic
Evelyne Campion
Kim-Anh Lê Cao
Daniel Le Bourhis
Christophe Richard
Nathalie Rodde
Renaud Fleurot
Robin E Everts
Jérôme Lecardonnel
Yvan Heyman
Xavier Vignon
Xiangzhong Yang
Xiuchun C Tian
Harris A Lewin
Jean-Paul Renard
Isabelle Hue
Agence Nationale des Fréquences · FRÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRLaboratoire de Biologie du Développement · FRUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USDépartement Biologie et Amélioration des Plantes · FRGénétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is the most efficient cell reprogramming technique available, especially when working with bovine species. Although SCNT blastocysts performed equally well or better than controls in the weeks following embryo transfer at Day 7, elongation and gastrulation defects were observed prior to implantation. To understand the developmental implications of embryonic/extra-embryonic interactions, the morphological and molecular features of elongating and gastrulating tissues were analysed. At Day 18, 30 SCNT conceptuses were compared to 20 controls (AI and IVP: 10 conceptuses each); one-half of the SCNT conceptuses appeared normal while the other half showed signs of atypical elongation and gastrulation. SCNT was also associated with a high incidence of discordance in embryonic and extra-embryonic patterns, as evidenced by morphological and molecular "uncoupling". Elongation appeared to be secondarily affected; only 3 of 30 conceptuses had abnormally elongated shapes and there were very few differences in gene expression when they were compared to the controls. However, some of these differences could be linked to defects in microvilli formation or extracellular matrix composition and could thus impact extra-embryonic functions. In contrast to elongation, gastrulation stages included embryonic defects that likely affected the hypoblast, the epiblast, or the early stages of their differentiation. When taking into account SCNT conceptus somatic origin, i.e. the reprogramming efficiency of each bovine ear fibroblast (Low: 0029, Med: 7711, High: 5538), we found that embryonic abnormalities or severe embryonic/extra-embryonic uncoupling were more tightly correlated to embryo loss at implantation than were elongation defects. Alternatively, extra-embryonic differences between SCNT and control conceptuses at Day 18 were related to molecular plasticity (high efficiency/high plasticity) and subsequent pregnancy loss. Finally, because it alters re-differentiation processes in vivo, SCNT reprogramming highlights temporally and spatially restricted interactions among cells and tissues in a unique way.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystCase-Control StudiesCattleCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationDNA PrimersEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo TransferExtraembryonic MembranesFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Regulatory NetworksIn Situ HybridizationMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNuclear Transfer TechniquesDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID22701625
PMCPMC3368877
OpenAlexW2034680085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.