Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22701575›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Visual associative learning in restrained honey bees with intact antennae.

Scott E Dobrin, Susan E Fahrbach

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An associative account of collective learning.Royal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Colour vision in ants (Formicidae, Hymenoptera).Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Olfactory Proboscis Extension Response in the Honey Bee: A Laboratory Exercise in Classical Conditioning.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Motion cues improve the performance of harnessed bees in a colour learning task.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Cognitive components of color vision in honey bees: how conditioning variables modulate color learning and discrimination.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2014
    Review
  20. Multisensory integration of colors and scents: insights from bees and flowers.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Scott E DobrinNeuroscience Program, Wake Forest University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America. dobrinse@wfu.edu
Susan E Fahrbach

Funding

Muscarinic regulation of plasticity in the brainR01GM073644 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ROBINSON, GENE E · 2006 to 2009
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM073644NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A restrained honey bee can be trained to extend its proboscis in response to the pairing of an odor with a sucrose reward, a form of olfactory associative learning referred to as the proboscis extension response (PER). Although the ability of flying honey bees to respond to visual cues is well-established, associative visual learning in restrained honey bees has been challenging to demonstrate. Those few groups that have documented vision-based PER have reported that removing the antennae prior to training is a prerequisite for learning. Here we report, for a simple visual learning task, the first successful performance by restrained honey bees with intact antennae. Honey bee foragers were trained on a differential visual association task by pairing the presentation of a blue light with a sucrose reward and leaving the presentation of a green light unrewarded. A negative correlation was found between age of foragers and their performance in the visual PER task. Using the adaptations to the traditional PER task outlined here, future studies can exploit pharmacological and physiological techniques to explore the neural circuit basis of visual learning in the honey bee.

Indexed as

Arthropod AntennaeColorAnimalsAssociation LearningBeesConditioning, ClassicalLightLinear ModelsRewardStatistics, NonparametricVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID22701575
PMCPMC3368934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.