ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2012
[Selected aspects of pediatric ophthalmology for non-pediatric ophthalmologists. Part 2: The odd looking optic nerve head in infants].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [MDVI patients - Multiply disabled visually impaired : On the situation of the child, parents and ophthalmologist with MDVI children].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article describes the clinical presentation of the most common congenital optic disc findings: optic nerve hypoplasia, optic disc cupping and pediatric optic atrophy. Particular emphasis is placed on the often difficult question: is it a physiological variant or is it pathological? Do I need further investigations? Pragmatic clinical hints are given to enable ophthalmologists to recognize normal variants with greater certainty but also not to overlook congenital optic nerve pathologies. Congenital anomalies of the optic nerve (head) are more common than half a century ago. They can affect the visual development and thus the general infantile development to a large extent if presenting bilaterally. They can occur isolated, with other ocular pathologies and/or accompanied by systemic diseases or syndromes, such as septo-optic dysplasia, albinism, prematurity, small for gestational age birth, as well as due to toxic exposure during pregnancy (e.g. drugs, alcohol and maternal diabetes). In addition to clinical illustrations to distinguish between physiological variants and pathologies of the optic nerve head, the different diagnostic and therapeutic options depending on the age of presentation of the infant are outlined. The reader will obtain some guidelines for distinguishing congenital and acquired optic nerve pathologies. The focal point of the present paper is with infants aged 0-2 years where many diagnostic imaging and psychophysical techniques cannot be applied. Therefore, this age group is the most difficult to correctly discriminate between physiological and pathological findings and to decide whether further diagnostic and/or treatment steps are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22699951What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.