Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22699502›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

High-throughput genomic sequencing of cassava bacterial blight strains identifies conserved effectors to target for durable resistance.

Rebecca Bart, Megan Cohn, Andrew Kassen, Emily J McCallum, Mikel Shybut, Annalise Petriello, Ksenia Krasileva, Douglas Dahlbeck, Cesar Medina, Titus Alicai and 10 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The roles ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fungal Effectoromics: A World in Constant Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Rebecca BartDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Megan Cohn
Andrew Kassen
Emily J McCallum
Mikel Shybut
Annalise Petriello
Ksenia Krasileva
Douglas Dahlbeck
Cesar Medina
Titus Alicai
Lava Kumar
Leandro M Moreira
Júlio Rodrigues Neto
Valerie Verdier
María Angélica Santana
Nuttima Kositcharoenkul
Hervé Vanderschuren
Wilhelm Gruissem
Adriana Bernal
Brian J Staskawicz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cassava bacterial blight (CBB), incited by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis (Xam), is the most important bacterial disease of cassava, a staple food source for millions of people in developing countries. Here we present a widely applicable strategy for elucidating the virulence components of a pathogen population. We report Illumina-based draft genomes for 65 Xam strains and deduce the phylogenetic relatedness of Xam across the areas where cassava is grown. Using an extensive database of effector proteins from animal and plant pathogens, we identify the effector repertoire for each sequenced strain and use a comparative sequence analysis to deduce the least polymorphic of the conserved effectors. These highly conserved effectors have been maintained over 11 countries, three continents, and 70 y of evolution and as such represent ideal targets for developing resistance strategies.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveDisease ProgressionGenome, BacterialGenomicsGeographyImmunity, InnateManihotModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPlant DiseasesPolymorphism, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNATime FactorsXanthomonas axonopodis

Identifiers

PMID22699502
PMCPMC3396514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.