ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2012
Customers or research participants? Guidance for research practices in commercialization of personal genomics.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Secondary Data Usage in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: To What Extent Are Customers Aware and Concerned?Public health genomics · 2021Article
- Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2020Article
- Ethical issues in consumer genome sequencing: Use of consumers' samples and data.Applied & translational genomics · 2016Article
- Flexible positions, managed hopes: the promissory bioeconomy of a whole genome sequencing cancer study.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2015Article
- Best ethical practices for clinicians and laboratories in the provision of noninvasive prenatal testing.Prenatal diagnosis · 2013Article
- 23 and Me, We, and You: direct-to-consumer genetics, intellectual property, and informed consent.Trends in biotechnology · 2013Article
- Personal genome testing in medical education: student experiences with genotyping in the classroom.Genome medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.