Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22698638›Full record

SynthesisFertility and sterility2012

Race matters: a systematic review of racial/ethnic disparity in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology reported outcomes.

Melissa F Wellons, Victor Y Fujimoto, Valerie L Baker, Debbie S Barrington, Diana Broomfield, William H Catherino, Gloria Richard-Davis, Mary Ryan, Kim Thornton, Alicia Y Armstrong

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Fertility and sterility, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The effect of donor and recipient race on outcomes of assisted reproduction.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Melissa F WellonsDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35249-7333, USA. wello002@uab.edu
Victor Y Fujimoto
Valerie L Baker
Debbie S Barrington
Diana Broomfield
William H Catherino
Gloria Richard-Davis
Mary Ryan
Kim Thornton
Alicia Y Armstrong

Funding

Reproductive Endocrinology And Infertility Clinical Training ProgramZIEHD008737 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI HILL, MICAH · 2011 to 2025
$24.0M
NIMHD DREAM Fellow Research and Training ProgramZIEMD000002 · NIMHD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES · PI GARDNER, KEVIN · 2012 to 2015
$5.1M
Increased Cardiovacular Risk and Early Natural Menopause in a Biracial CohortK23HL087114 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WELLONS, MELISSA FAIR · 2008 to 2012
$744k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL087114NHLBI NIH HHS K23-HL-87114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review the reporting of race/ethnicity in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) Clinic Outcome Reporting System (CORS) publications.

designSystematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology of literature published in PubMed on race/ethnicity that includes data from SART CORS.

settingNot applicable. PATIENT(S): Not applicable. INTERVENTION(S): In vitro fertilization cycles reported to SART. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Any outcomes reported in SART CORS. RESULT(S): Seven publications were identified that assessed racial/ethnic disparities in IVF outcomes using SART data. All reported a racial/ethnic disparity. However, more than 35% of cycles were excluded from analysis because of missing race/ethnicity data. CONCLUSION(S): Review of current publications of SART data suggests significant racial/ethnic disparities in IVF outcomes. However, the potential for selection bias limits confidence in these findings, given that fewer than 65% of SART reported cycles include race/ethnicity. Our understanding of how race/ethnicity influences ART outcome could be greatly improved if information on race/ethnicity was available for all reported cycles.

Indexed as

Reproductive Techniques, AssistedResearch ReportSocieties, MedicalEthnicityFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleRacial GroupsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22698638
PMCPMC3409320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.