ArticleAmerican journal of public health2012
Incentives for research participation: policy and practice from Canadian corrections.
Article in American journal of public health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- US jail and prison institutional research policies: a lever in access to research for incarcerated people.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- Methods and tools used to assess patient experience with healthcare services in prisons: a scoping review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026Article
- Continuing the conversation: practical strategies to enable acceptable and feasible health research in prisons.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Nonconsensual Sexual Experience Histories of Incarcerated Men: A Mixed Methods Approach.International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology · 2024Article
- Elder's life course theory and person-centered research: A lens for conducting ethical nursing research and mental health nursing practice with older adults aging with the diagnosis of schizophrenia.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2022Article
- Reasons for COVID-19 vaccine refusal among people incarcerated in Canadian federal prisons.PloS one · 2022Article
- Ethics of health research with prisoners in Canada.BMC medical ethics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We explored current policies and practices on the use of incentives in research involving adult offenders under correctional supervision in prison and in the community (probation and parole) in Canada. We contacted the correctional departments of each of the Canadian provinces and territories, as well as the federal government department responsible for offenders serving sentences of two years or more. Findings indicated that two departments had formal policy whereas others had unwritten practices, some prohibiting their use and others allowing incentives on a case-by-case basis. Given the differences across jurisdictions, it would be valuable to examine how current incentive policies and practices are implemented to inform national best practices on incentives for offender-based research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.