Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22697272›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2012

Axonal properties determine somatic firing in a model of in vitro CA1 hippocampal sharp wave/ripples and persistent gamma oscillations.

Roger D Traub, Dietmar Schmitz, Nikolaus Maier, Miles A Whittington, Andreas Draguhn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neuronal Glutamatergic Network Electrically Wired with Silent But Activatable Gap Junctions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  7. A Role for Electrotonic Coupling Between Cortical Pyramidal Cells.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Memory replay in balanced recurrent networks.PLoS computational biology · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Excitation and inhibition compete to control spiking during hippocampal ripples: intracellular study in behaving mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Recruitment of oriens-lacunosum-moleculare interneurons during hippocampal ripples.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Roger D TraubDepartment of Physical Sciences, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA. rtraub@us.ibm.com
Dietmar Schmitz
Nikolaus Maier
Miles A Whittington
Andreas Draguhn
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHeidelberg University · DEIBM (United States) · USNewcastle University · GB

Funding

Detailed Models of Network Bursts and OscillationsR01NS044133 · NINDS · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI TRAUB, ROGER D · 2002 to 2017
$3.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044133NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS044133NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS062995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence has been presented that CA1 pyramidal cells, during spontaneous in vitro sharp wave/ripple (SPW-R) complexes, generate somatic action potentials that originate in axons. 'Participating' (somatically firing) pyramidal cells fire (almost always) at most once during a particular SPW-R whereas non-participating cells virtually never fire during an SPW-R. Somatic spikelets were small or absent, while ripple-frequency EPSCs and IPSCs occurred during the SPW-R in pyramidal neurons. These experimental findings could be replicated with a network model in which electrical coupling was present between small pyramidal cell axonal branches. Here, we explore this model in more depth. Factors that influence somatic participation include: (i) the diameter of axonal branches that contain coupling sites to other axons, because firing in larger branches injects more current into the main axon, increasing antidromic firing probability; (ii) axonal K(+) currents and (iii) somatic hyperpolarization and shunting. We predict that portions of axons fire at high frequency during SPW-R, while somata fire much less. In the model, somatic firing can occur by occasional generation of full action potentials in proximal axonal branches, which are excited by high-frequency spikelets. When the network contains phasic synaptic inhibition, at the axonal gap junction site, gamma oscillations result, again with more frequent axonal firing than somatic firing. Combining the models, so as to generate gamma followed by sharp waves, leads to strong overlap between the population of cells firing during gamma and the population of cells firing during a subsequent sharp wave, as observed in vivo.

Indexed as

Brain WavesModels, NeurologicalAnimalsAxonsCA1 Region, HippocampalHumansPyramidal CellsSynaptic Potentials

Identifiers

PMID22697272
PMCPMC3433594
OpenAlexW1677357890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.