Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22696683›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2012

Perturbation-based analysis and modeling of combinatorial regulation in the yeast sulfur assimilation pathway.

R Scott McIsaac, Allegra A Petti, Harmen J Bussemaker, David Botstein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Homotypic cooperativity and collective binding are determinants of bHLH specificity and function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Identifying genetic modulators of the connectivity between transcription factors and their transcriptional targets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R Scott McIsaacThe Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. rmcisaac@princeton.edu
Allegra A Petti
Harmen J Bussemaker
David Botstein
Princeton University · USColumbia University · US

Funding

Spatial Patterning During DevelopmentP50GM071508 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, SUSAN M · 2004 to 2013
$30.6M
Genetics of Functional Interactions in YeastR01GM046406 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOTSTEIN, DAVID · 2001 to 2015
$9.5M
Inferring regulatory circuitry from microarray dataR01HG003008 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI BUSSEMAKER, HARMEN J · 2004 to 2020
$7.0M
GENETICS OF FUNCTIONAL INTERACTIONS IN YEASTR37GM046406 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOTSTEIN, DAVID · 1991 to 2000
$683k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG003008NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003008NIGMS NIH HHS GM046406NIGMS NIH HHS GM071508NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM071508NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046406NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM046406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In yeast, the pathways of sulfur assimilation are combinatorially controlled by five transcriptional regulators (three DNA-binding proteins [Met31p, Met32p, and Cbf1p], an activator [Met4p], and a cofactor [Met28p]) and a ubiquitin ligase subunit (Met30p). This regulatory system exerts combinatorial control not only over sulfur assimilation and methionine biosynthesis, but also on many other physiological functions in the cell. Recently we characterized a gene induction system that, upon the addition of an inducer, results in near-immediate transcription of a gene of interest under physiological conditions. We used this to perturb levels of single transcription factors during steady-state growth in chemostats, which facilitated distinction of direct from indirect effects of individual factors dynamically through quantification of the subsequent changes in genome-wide patterns of gene expression. We were able to show directly that Cbf1p acts sometimes as a repressor and sometimes as an activator. We also found circumstances in which Met31p/Met32p function as repressors, as well as those in which they function as activators. We elucidated and numerically modeled feedback relationships among the regulators, notably feedforward regulation of Met32p (but not Met31p) by Met4p that generates dynamic differences in abundance that can account for the differences in function of these two proteins despite their identical binding sites.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalMethionineSaccharomyces cerevisiae5-Methyltetrahydrofolate-Homocysteine S-MethyltransferaseBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsBinding SitesDNA-Binding ProteinsF-Box ProteinsGenome, FungalProtein BindingSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSulfurTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticUbiquitinUbiquitin-Protein Ligase Complexes5-Methyltetrahydrofolate-Homocysteine S-MethyltransferaseBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsCBF1 protein, S cerevisiaeDNA-Binding ProteinsF-Box ProteinsMET30 protein, S cerevisiaeMet31 protein, S cerevisiaeMet32 protein, S cerevisiaeMethionineSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSulfurTranscription FactorsUbiquitinUbiquitin-Protein Ligase Complexes

Identifiers

PMID22696683
PMCPMC3408425
OpenAlexW1975941356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.