SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 2019.World journal of surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Calculating the risk of a pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2015Pooled it
- Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Surgery today · 2015Pooled it
- Resection versus other treatments for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of fibrin sealants for patients undergoing pancreatic resection.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2014Pooled it
- Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction After PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): Perioperative and Long-term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of surgery · 2016Trial
- A biomarker-integrated nomogram for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula in low- to intermediate-risk patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Thyroid Cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- Clinical outcomes and costs of the use of fibrin sealant in pancreaticojejunal anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective analysis study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
- Postoperative hemorrhage complications following the Whipple procedure.Turkish journal of surgery · 2019Article
- Are there preoperative factors related to a "soft pancreas" and are they predictive of pancreatic fistulas after pancreatic resection?Surgery today · 2015Article
- Correlation between preoperative imaging and intraoperative risk assessment in the prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy.World journal of surgery · 2014Article
- Chronic pancreatitis of the pancreatic remnant is an independent risk factor for pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy.BMC surgery · 2014Article
- Efficacy of the double-pigtail stent as a conservative treatment for grade B pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatogastric anastomosis.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Article
- Postoperative serum amylase predicts pancreatic fistula formation following pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2014Article
- Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: up-to-date and literature review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic resections are associated with high morbidity (30% to 60%) and mortality (5%). Synthetic analogues of somatostatin are advocated by some surgeons to reduce complications following pancreatic surgery, however their use is controversial.
objectivesTo determine whether prophylactic somatostatin analogues should be used routinely in pancreatic surgery. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 12), MEDLINE, EMBASE and Science Citation Index Expanded to December 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials comparing prophylactic somatostatin or one of its analogues versus no drug or placebo during pancreatic surgery (irrespective of language or publication status). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and independently extracted data. We analysed data with both the fixed-effect and random-effects models using Review Manager (RevMan). We calculated the risk ratio (RR), mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on an intention-to-treat or available case analysis. When it was not possible to perform either of the above, we performed per protocol analysis. MAIN
resultsWe identified 19 trials (17 trials of high risk of bias) involving 2245 patients. There was no significant difference in the perioperative mortality (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.16; N = 2210) or the number of patients with drug-related adverse effects between the two groups (RR 2.09; 95% CI 0.83 to 5.24; N = 1199). Quality of life was not reported in any of the trials. The overall number of patients with postoperative complications was significantly lower in the somatostatin analogue group (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.79; N = 1858) but there was no significant difference in the re-operation rate (RR 1.26; 95% CI 0.58 to 2.70; N = 687) or hospital stay (MD -1.04 days; 95% CI -2.54 to 0.46; N = 1269) between the groups. The incidence of pancreatic fistula was lower in the somatostatin analogue group (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.77; N = 2161). The proportion of these fistulas that were clinically significant was not mentioned in most trials. On inclusion of trials that clearly distinguished clinically significant fistulas, there was no significant difference between the two groups (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.34 to 1.41; N = 247). AUTHORS'
conclusionsSomatostatin analogues may reduce perioperative complications but do not reduce perioperative mortality. Further adequately powered trials with low risk of bias are necessary. Based on the current available evidence, somatostatin and its analogues are recommended for routine use in patients undergoing pancreatic resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.