Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22696378›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Sonothrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.

Stefano Ricci, Lavinia Dinia, Massimo Del Sette, Paolo Anzola, Tatiana Mazzoli, Silvia Cenciarelli, Carlo Gandolfo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04250376 (The Use of Transcranial Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Dementias), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04250376 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Transcranial Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Dementias

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeurological Associates of West Los AngelesRan2017 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsMild Cognitive Impairment, Mild Dementia, Parkinson Disease, Alzheimer DiseaseArmsFocused Transcranial Ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefano RicciUO Neurologia, ASL 1 dell’ Umbria, Città di Castello, Italy. istitaly@unipg.it.
Lavinia Dinia
Massimo Del Sette
Paolo Anzola
Tatiana Mazzoli
Silvia Cenciarelli
Carlo Gandolfo

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZB/4/784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSonothrombolysis is a promising but unproven tool for treating acute ischaemic stroke. There is an ongoing debate about the efficacy, safety, technical aspects of ultrasound administration and the possible potentiating effect of microbubbles.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of sonothrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched in November 2011), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 12), MEDLINE (1950 to November 2011), EMBASE (1980 to November 2011), Database of Abstract and Review of Effects (DARE) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 11), Stroke Trials Registry, Clinicaltrials.gov and Current Controlled Trials. We also searched the reference lists from relevant articles and reviews, and contacted colleagues, authors and researchers active in the field. Searching was completed in November 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of sonothrombolysis (any duration, any frequency of ultrasound, with or without microbubbles administration) started within 12 hours of symptom onset compared with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or conventional treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted the data independently. We contacted study authors for missing data. MAIN

resultsWe identified five eligible studies (233 patients). For the primary outcome (death or dependency at three months), five studies with a total number of 206 patients were available (four defined independence as a modified Rankin score of 0 to 2 and one used 0 to 1). Patients treated with sonothrombolysis were no more likely to be dead or disabled at three months (odds ratio (OR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 1.44). For the secondary outcomes, failure to recanalise was lower in the sonothrombolysis group (230 patients) (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.50), no significant difference was found in mortality (206 patients) and in cerebral haemorrhage (233 patients). AUTHORS'

conclusionsSonothrombolysis did not reduce death or dependency at three months, but appeared to increase recanalisation without clear hazard. A larger clinical trial is warranted.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaContrast MediaFibrinolytic AgentsHumansMechanical ThrombolysisMicrobubblesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeTissue Plasminogen ActivatorUltrasonic TherapyContrast MediaFibrinolytic AgentsTissue Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.