SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Sonothrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04250376 (The Use of Transcranial Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Dementias), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Use of Transcranial Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Dementias
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Microbubbles combined with ultrasound therapy in ischemic stroke: A systematic review of in-vivo preclinical studies.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Sonolysis during carotid endarterectomy: randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Trial
- A pragmatic approach to sonothrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: the Norwegian randomised controlled sonothrombolysis in acute stroke study (NOR-SASS).BMC neurology · 2015Trial
- Targeted nano-delivery strategies for facilitating thrombolysis treatment in ischemic stroke.Drug delivery · 2021Article
- Acoustic and Elastic Properties of a Blood Clot during Microbubble-Enhanced Sonothrombolysis: Hardening of the Clot with Inertial Cavitation.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.European stroke journal · 2021Article
- Article
- Research progress in ultrasound use for the diagnosis and treatment of cerebrovascular diseases.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2019Review
- Focused transcranial ultrasound for treatment of neurodegenerative dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2019Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging to visualize stroke and characterize stroke recovery: a review.Frontiers in neurology · 2013Article
- Transcranial Doppler ultrasound: a review of the physical principles and major applications in critical care.International journal of vascular medicine · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSonothrombolysis is a promising but unproven tool for treating acute ischaemic stroke. There is an ongoing debate about the efficacy, safety, technical aspects of ultrasound administration and the possible potentiating effect of microbubbles.
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of sonothrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched in November 2011), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 12), MEDLINE (1950 to November 2011), EMBASE (1980 to November 2011), Database of Abstract and Review of Effects (DARE) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 11), Stroke Trials Registry, Clinicaltrials.gov and Current Controlled Trials. We also searched the reference lists from relevant articles and reviews, and contacted colleagues, authors and researchers active in the field. Searching was completed in November 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of sonothrombolysis (any duration, any frequency of ultrasound, with or without microbubbles administration) started within 12 hours of symptom onset compared with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or conventional treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted the data independently. We contacted study authors for missing data. MAIN
resultsWe identified five eligible studies (233 patients). For the primary outcome (death or dependency at three months), five studies with a total number of 206 patients were available (four defined independence as a modified Rankin score of 0 to 2 and one used 0 to 1). Patients treated with sonothrombolysis were no more likely to be dead or disabled at three months (odds ratio (OR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 1.44). For the secondary outcomes, failure to recanalise was lower in the sonothrombolysis group (230 patients) (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.50), no significant difference was found in mortality (206 patients) and in cerebral haemorrhage (233 patients). AUTHORS'
conclusionsSonothrombolysis did not reduce death or dependency at three months, but appeared to increase recanalisation without clear hazard. A larger clinical trial is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22696378What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.