SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Regimens of fetal surveillance for impaired fetal growth.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Immediate versus deferred delivery of the preterm baby with suspected fetal compromise for improving outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Regimens of fetal surveillance of suspected large-for-gestational-age fetuses for improving health outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Fetal Growth Restriction. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/080, October 2024).Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2025Article
- Frequency of third trimester umbilical artery Doppler for improving neonatal outcomes in high-risk pregnancies: a randomized trial.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2023Article
- Intrauterine Growth Restriction-Prediction and Peripartum Data on Hospital Care.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Early Onset Intrauterine Growth Restriction-Data from a Tertiary Care Center in a Middle-Income Country.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- The PLANES study: a protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study of the placental growth factor (PlGF) blood test-informed care versus standard care alone for women with a small for gestational age fetus at or after 32 + 0 weeks' gestation.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2020Article
- Article
- Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/080, October 2016).Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2017Article
- Early onset fetal growth restriction.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2017Review
- Preventing deaths due to the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2016Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPolicies and protocols for fetal surveillance in the pregnancy where impaired fetal growth is suspected vary widely, with numerous combinations of different surveillance methods.
objectivesTo assess the effects of antenatal fetal surveillance regimens on important perinatal and maternal outcomes. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (29 February 2012). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing the effects of described antenatal fetal surveillance regimens. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Review authors R Grivell and L Wong independently assessed trial eligibility and quality and extracted data. MAIN
resultsWe included one trial of 167 women and their babies. This trial was a pilot study recruiting alongside another study, therefore, a separate sample size was not calculated. The trial compared a twice-weekly surveillance regimen (biophysical profile, nonstress tests, umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery Doppler and uterine artery Doppler) with the same regimen applied fortnightly (both groups had growth assessed fortnightly). There were insufficient data to assess this review's primary infant outcome of composite perinatal mortality and serious morbidity (although there were no perinatal deaths) and no difference was seen in the primary maternal outcome of emergency caesarean section for fetal distress (risk ratio (RR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35 to 2.63). In keeping with the more frequent monitoring, mean gestational age at birth was four days less for the twice-weekly surveillance group compared with the fortnightly surveillance group (mean difference (MD) -4.00; 95% CI -7.79 to -0.21). Women in the twice-weekly surveillance group were 25% more likely to have induction of labour than those in the fortnightly surveillance group (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.50). AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is limited evidence from randomised controlled trials to inform best practice for fetal surveillance regimens when caring for women with pregnancies affected by impaired fetal growth. More studies are needed to evaluate the effects of currently used fetal surveillance regimens in impaired fetal growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.