SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Melatonin as add-on treatment for epilepsy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Melatonin as add-on treatment for epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Melatonin improves sleep in children with epilepsy: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study.Sleep medicine · 2015Trial
- Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Strategies in Epilepsy: From Molecular Mechanisms to Threshold Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Pediatric sleep disturbances and treatment with melatonin.Journal of translational medicine · 2019Review
- Melatonin in Critically Ill Children.Journal of pediatric intensive care · 2016Review
- Antioxidants as a preventive treatment for epileptic process: a review of the current status.Current neuropharmacology · 2014Article
- Chronopharmacology of anti-convulsive therapy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurologic disorders. Despite the plethora of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) currently available, 30% of patients continue having seizures. This group of patients requires a more aggressive treatment, since monotherapy, the first choice scheme, fails to control seizures. Nevertheless, polytherapy often results in a number of unwanted effects, including neurologic disturbances (somnolence, ataxia, dizziness), psychiatric and behavioral symptoms, and metabolic alteration (osteoporosis, inducement or inhibition of hepatic enzymes, etc.). The need for better tolerated AEDs is even more urgent in this group of patients. Reports have suggested an antiepileptic role of melatonin with a good safety profile.
objectivesTo assess the efficacy and tolerability of melatonin as add-on treatment for epilepsy. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (May 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL Issue 4 of 12, The Cochrane Library 2012), and MEDLINE (1946 to April 2012). The bibliographies of any identified study were searched for further references. We handsearched selected journals and conference proceedings. No language restrictions were imposed. In addition, we contacted melatonin manufacturers (i.e. Nathura) and original investigators to identify any unpublished study. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials; double, single, or unblinded trials; parallel group or cross-over studies. People with epilepsy regardless of age and sex, including children and adults with disabilities. Administration of melatonin as add-on treatment to any AED(s) compared to add-on placebo or no add-on treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Review authors independently selected trials for inclusion according to predefined criteria, extracted relevant data, and evaluated the methodologic quality of trials. The following outcomes were assessed: at least 50% seizure reduction, seizure freedom, adverse events, and quality of life. MAIN
resultsFour publications, with a total of 102 participants (90 aged under 18 years), were included. Two different comparisons were available: 1. melatonin versus placebo and 2. melatonin 5 mg versus melatonin 10 mg. Despite our primary intention, due to insufficient information on outcomes, we were unable to perform any meta-analysis, but summarized data narratively. Two studies were randomized, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled trials and two were randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled trials. Only one study provided the exact number of seizures during the trial compared to the baseline: none of the patients with seizures during the trial had a change in seizure frequency compared with the baseline. Adverse events were systematically evaluated in only one study (no adverse events observed). Only one study systematically evaluated quality of life, showing no statistically significant improvement in quality of life in the add-on melatonin group. AUTHORS'
conclusionsIncluded studies were of poor methodologic quality, and did not systematically evaluate seizure frequency and adverse events, so that it was impossible to summarize data in a meta-analysis. It is not possible to draw any conclusion about the role of melatonin in reducing seizure frequency or improving quality of life in patients with epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.