Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22695821›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2012

Noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring.

Jasper Truijen, Johannes J van Lieshout, Wilbert A Wesselink, Berend E Westerhof

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04369976 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Estimating the Optimal G Level for Training and Rehabilitation on a Short Arm Human Centrifuge

TypeinterventionalSponsorGreek Aerospace Medical Association and Space ResearchRan2020 to 2025Enrolled105ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Stroke, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, AgedArmsARTIFICIAL GRAVITY COMBINED WITH EXERCISE
NCT06518980 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Validation of Intraoperative Blood Pressure Monitors: the Influence of Site and Execution Strategy. The PROMISES Trial

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCiusss de L'Est de l'Île de MontréalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsAnesthesia, Blood Pressure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jasper TruijenLaboratory for Clinical Cardiovascular Physiology, AMC Heart Failure Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes J van Lieshout
Wilbert A Wesselink
Berend E Westerhof

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring of continuous blood pressure and cardiac output is important to prevent hypoperfusion and to guide fluid administration, but only few patients receive such monitoring due to the invasive nature of most of the methods presently available. Noninvasive blood pressure can be determined continuously using finger cuff technology and cardiac output is easily obtained using a pulse contour method. In this way completely noninvasive continuous blood pressure and cardiac output are available for clinical use in all patients that would otherwise not be monitored. Developments and state of art in hemodynamic monitoring are reviewed here, with a focus on noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring form the finger.

Indexed as

Cardiac OutputBlood Pressure DeterminationBlood Volume DeterminationHumansMonitoring, Ambulatory

Identifiers

PMID22695821
PMCPMC3391359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.