Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22695779›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2012

[Platelet function: new drugs, new assays : possible impacts on operative medicine?].

E Mahla, T Höchtl, F Prüller, M K Freynhofer, K Huber

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Point-of-care-based hemotherapy].Der Anaesthesist · 2013
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E MahlaUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Universität Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Österreich, Deutschland. elisabeth.mahla@medunigraz.at
T Höchtl
F Prüller
M K Freynhofer
K Huber
Wilhelminen Hospital · ATMedical University of Graz · ATUniversity of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor blocker is a well-established strategy to prevent thrombotic complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Current practice guidelines for antiplatelet therapy advocate a 1 to 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy after bare metal stent PCI and an up to 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI in patients with ACS and drug-eluting stent PCI. Premature withdrawal of dual antiplatelet therapy carries a substantial risk of stent thrombosis but perioperative continuation of dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, particularly in patients treated with the new potent drugs prasugrel and ticagrelor. Based on the various available assays, the lack of validated cut-offs and the disappointing results of targeted antiplatelet therapy as demonstrated by the GRAVITAS trial, current guidelines of international societies recommend platelet function testing only for selected high risk patients despite the known association between clopidogrel low responsiveness and ischemic events. However, for individual patients taking clopidogrel, platelet function monitoring may be considered to safely shorten the preoperative waiting period, to assess the risk of bleeding and transfusion and to initiate specific therapy in bleeding patients.

Indexed as

Platelet Function TestsAdenosineAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryClopidogrelHumansPiperazinesPlatelet AggregationPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPoint-of-Care SystemsPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative HemorrhagePractice Guidelines as TopicPrasugrel HydrochloridePredictive Value of TestsStentsThiophenesAdenosineClopidogrelPiperazinesPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrasugrel HydrochlorideThiophenesTicagrelorTiclopidine

Identifiers

PMID22695779
OpenAlexW115022801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.