ArticleHerz2012
[ECG diagnostics in competitive athletes. Current implications for preparticipation screening].
Article in Herz, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exercise and sports in cardiac patients and athletes at risk: Balance between benefit and harm.Herz · 2015Article
- Disrespectful thoughts on dimensions in the outer and inner world.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2004Article
- Different habitus but similar electrocardiogram: Cardiac repolarization parameters in children - Comparison of elite athletes to obese children.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In young competitive athletes sudden cardiac death frequently occurs as a tragic first manifestation of clinically inapparent underlying structural or electrical cardiac disorders. An increased risk may be reflected by typical electrocardiogram (ECG) alterations preceding symptoms but a correct interpretation is often challenging due to a high prevalence of training-related ECG alterations in competitive athletes mimicking such disorders. Misinterpretation may thus result in either unnecessary disqualification from competitive sports or continuation despite an increased risk or extensive diagnostic work-ups yielding additional equivocal findings. However, as observed in large athlete cohorts in recent years a variety of ECG alterations, such as isolated increased QRS voltage, early repolarization, sinus bradycardia, first degree AV block or incomplete right bundle branch block, represent common variants of ECGs of athletes reflecting physiological and training-related cardiac adaptations. These alterations do not usually require further diagnostic evaluation. In contrast, alterations such as repolarization abnormalities, complete bundle branch block, prolonged QT intervals or pathological Q waves, are strongly suggestive of underlying disorders and require further evaluation even in asymptomatic athletes. Thus, the ECG plays a pivotal role in the prevention of sudden cardiac death in competitive athletes. The present article summarizes current recommendations for the interpretation of athlete ECGs regarding the differentiation between physiological or pathological cardiac adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.