Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22694800›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diabetology2012

Effects of diabetes on myocardial infarct size and cardioprotection by preconditioning and postconditioning.

Takayuki Miki, Takahito Itoh, Daisuke Sunaga, Tetsuji Miura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role of AMP deaminase in diabetic cardiomyopathy.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Guidelines on models of diabetic heart disease.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Takayuki MikiSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South-1 West-16, Sapporo 060-8543, Japan. tmiki@sapmed.ac.jp
Takahito Itoh
Daisuke Sunaga
Tetsuji Miura

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spite of the current optimal therapy, the mortality of patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) remains high, particularly in cases with diabetes mellitus (DM) as a co-morbidity. Myocardial infarct size is a major determinant of prognosis in IHD patients, and development of a novel strategy to limit infarction is of great clinical importance. Ischemic preconditioning (PC), postconditioning (PostC) and their mimetic agents have been shown to reduce infarct size in experiments using healthy animals. However, a variety of pharmacological agents have failed to demonstrate infarct size limitation in clinical trials. One of the possible reasons for the discrepancy between the results of animal experiments and clinical trials is that co-morbidities, including DM, modified myocardial responses to ischemia/reperfusion and to cardioprotective agents. Here we summarize observations of the effects of DM on myocardial infarct size and ischemic PC and PostC and discuss perspectives for protection of DM hearts.

Indexed as

Ischemic PostconditioningIschemic Preconditioning, MyocardialAnimalsBlood GlucoseComorbidityDiabetes MellitusDisease Models, AnimalHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumRisk FactorsSignal TransductionTreatment OutcomeBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID22694800
PMCPMC3461466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.