ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2012
Thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction with hormonal contraception.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02198677 (Randomized Trial of Cardiovascular Response to Two Manual Techniques Non-thrust Joint Manipulation of the Cervical Spine in Patients With Non-traumatic Mechanical Neck Pain.), which is not on this map. Cited by 173 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Trial of Cardiovascular Response to Two Manual Techniques Non-thrust Joint Manipulation of the Cervical Spine in Patients With Non-traumatic Mechanical Neck Pain.
Who cites it
173 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 589 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brazilian Guideline on Menopausal Cardiovascular Health - 2024.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Guideline
- Combined oral contraceptive pill for primary dysmenorrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in Women Using Combined Oral Contraceptive: A Systematic Review.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022Pooled it
- Systemic hormonal contraception initiation after abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Contraception · 2021Pooled it
- A systematic review on clinical effectiveness, side-effect profile and meta-analysis on continuation rate of etonogestrel contraceptive implant.Reproductive health · 2021Pooled it
- Hormonal Contraceptive Use and Risk of Attempted and Completed Suicide: a Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2020Pooled it
- Association between the reproductive health of young women and cardiovascular disease in later life: umbrella review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2020Pooled it
- Guideline
- Oral Contraceptive Use and Increased Risk of Stroke: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Pooled it
- Association between progestin-only contraceptive use and cardiometabolic outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2018Pooled it
- Nonoral combined hormonal contraceptives and thromboembolism: a systematic review.Contraception · 2017Pooled it
- Safety of hormonal contraceptives among women with migraine: A systematic review.Contraception · 2016Pooled it
- Progestin-only contraception and thromboembolism: A systematic review.Contraception · 2016Pooled it
- Combined oral contraceptives: the risk of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research.BMC medical research methodology · 2015Pooled it
- Adverse effects of the common treatments for polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2013Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of drospirenone as a progestin-only pill in Japanese women: A phase III study.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2025Trial
- Ethinylestradiol in combined hormonal contraceptive has a broader effect on serum proteome compared with estradiol valerate: a randomized controlled trial.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023Trial
- Evaluation of the food effect on a drospirenone only contraceptive containing 4 mg administered with and without high-fat breakfast in a randomised trial.BMC women's health · 2022Trial
- Bleeding profile of women using a drospirenone-only pill 4 mg over nine cycles in comparison with desogestrel 0.075 mg.PloS one · 2020Trial
113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by[Not Available].2013
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough several studies have assessed the risk of venous thromboembolism with newer hormonal contraception, few have examined thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction, and results have been conflicting.
methodsIn this 15-year Danish historical cohort study, we followed nonpregnant women, 15 to 49 years old, with no history of cardiovascular disease or cancer. Data on use of hormonal contraception, clinical end points, and potential confounders were obtained from four national registries.
resultsA total of 1,626,158 women contributed 14,251,063 person-years of observation, during which 3311 thrombotic strokes (21.4 per 100,000 person-years) and 1725 myocardial infarctions (10.1 per 100,000 person-years) occurred. As compared with nonuse, current use of oral contraceptives that included ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 30 to 40 μg was associated with the following relative risks (and 95% confidence intervals) for thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction, according to progestin type: norethindrone, 2.2 (1.5 to 3.2) and 2.3 (1.3 to 3.9); levonorgestrel, 1.7 (1.4 to 2.0) and 2.0 (1.6 to 2.5); norgestimate, 1.5 (1.2 to 1.9) and 1.3 (0.9 to 1.9); desogestrel, 2.2 (1.8 to 2.7) and 2.1 (1.5 to 2.8); gestodene, 1.8 (1.6 to 2.0) and 1.9 (1.6 to 2.3); and drospirenone, 1.6 (1.2 to 2.2) and 1.7 (1.0 to 2.6), respectively. With ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 20 μg, the corresponding relative risks according to progestin type were as follows: desogestrel, 1.5 (1.3 to 1.9) and 1.6 (1.1 to 2.1); gestodene, 1.7 (1.4 to 2.1) and 1.2 (0.8 to 1.9); and drospirenone, 0.9 (0.2 to 3.5) and 0.0. For transdermal patches, the corresponding relative risks were 3.2 (0.8 to 12.6) and 0.0, and for a vaginal ring, 2.5 (1.4 to 4.4) and 2.1 (0.7 to 6.5).
conclusionsAlthough the absolute risks of thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction associated with the use of hormonal contraception were low, the risk was increased by a factor of 0.9 to 1.7 with oral contraceptives that included ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 20 μg and by a factor of 1.3 to 2.3 with those that included ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 30 to 40 μg, with relatively small differences in risk according to progestin type. (Funded by the Danish Heart Association.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.