Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22693438›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2012

General anesthetics predicted to block the GLIC pore with micromolar affinity.

David N LeBard, Jérôme Hénin, Roderic G Eckenhoff, Michael L Klein, Grace Brannigan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Alchemical Free Energy Calculations on Membrane-Associated Proteins.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Allosteric potentiation of a ligand-gated ion channel is mediated by access to a deep membrane-facing cavity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Propofol inhibits prokaryotic voltage-gated NaThe Journal of general physiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David N LeBardDepartment of Chemistry and Institute for Computational Molecular Science, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jérôme Hénin
Roderic G Eckenhoff
Michael L Klein
Grace Brannigan
Temple University · USArchitecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques · FRRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

X-ray and Neutron Interferometry Studies of Anesthetic Interactions with VoltageP01GM055876 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LOLL, PATRICK J · 1997 to 2017
$22.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM055876NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM055876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although general anesthetics are known to modulate the activity of ligand-gated ion channels in the Cys-loop superfamily, there is at present neither consensus on the underlying mechanisms, nor predictive models of this modulation. Viable models need to offer quantitative assessment of the relative importance of several identified anesthetic binding sites. However, to date, precise affinity data for individual sites has been challenging to obtain by biophysical means. Here, the likely role of pore block inhibition by the general anesthetics isoflurane and propofol of the prokaryotic pentameric channel GLIC is investigated by molecular simulations. Microscopic affinities are calculated for both single and double occupancy binding of isoflurane and propofol to the GLIC pore. Computations are carried out for an open-pore conformation in which the pore is restrained to crystallographic radius, and a closed-pore conformation that results from unrestrained molecular dynamics equilibration of the structure. The GLIC pore is predicted to be blocked at the micromolar concentrations for which inhibition by isofluorane and propofol is observed experimentally. Calculated affinities suggest that pore block by propofol occurs at signifcantly lower concentrations than those for which inhibition is observed: we argue that this discrepancy may result from binding of propofol to an allosteric site recently identified by X-ray crystallography, which may cause a competing gain-of-function effect. Affinities of isoflurane and propofol to the allosteric site are also calculated, and shown to be 3 mM for isoflurane and 10 μM for propofol; both anesthetics have a lower affinity for the allosteric site than for the unoccupied pore.

Indexed as

Allosteric SiteAnesthetics, GeneralBacterial ProteinsBinding SitesComputer SimulationCysteine Loop Ligand-Gated Ion Channel ReceptorsModels, MolecularProtein ConformationThermodynamicsAnesthetics, GeneralBacterial ProteinsCysteine Loop Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptors

Identifiers

PMID22693438
PMCPMC3364936
OpenAlexW2073025354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.