Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22693212›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2012

CPred: a web server for predicting viable circular permutations in proteins.

Wei-Cheng Lo, Li-Fen Wang, Yen-Yi Liu, Tian Dai, Jenn-Kang Hwang, Ping-Chiang Lyu

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mitigating genetic instability caused by the excision activity of theApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. The importance of the location of the N-terminus in successful protein folding in vivo and in vitro.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. SeqCP: A sequence-based algorithm for searching circularly permuted proteins.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei-Cheng LoInstitute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Li-Fen Wang
Yen-Yi Liu
Tian Dai
Jenn-Kang Hwang
Ping-Chiang Lyu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circular permutation (CP) is a protein structural rearrangement phenomenon, through which nature allows structural homologs to have different locations of termini and thus varied activities, stabilities and functional properties. It can be applied in many fields of protein research and bioengineering. The limitation of applying CP lies in its technical complexity, high cost and uncertainty of the viability of the resulting protein variants. Not every position in a protein can be used to create a viable circular permutant, but there is still a lack of practical computational tools for evaluating the positional feasibility of CP before costly experiments are carried out. We have previously designed a comprehensive method for predicting viable CP cleavage sites in proteins. In this work, we implement that method into an efficient and user-friendly web server named CPred (CP site predictor), which is supposed to be helpful to promote fundamental researches and biotechnological applications of CP. The CPred is accessible at http://sarst.life.nthu.edu.tw/CPred.

Indexed as

Protein ConformationSoftwareArtificial IntelligenceInternetProbabilityUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID22693212
PMCPMC3394280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.