Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22692887›Full record

ReviewBirth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews2012

Computational models for mechanics of morphogenesis.

Matthew A Wyczalkowski, Zi Chen, Benjamen A Filas, Victor D Varner, Larry A Taber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optogenetic Rescue Reveals Spatiotemporal Rules of Germ-Layer Patterning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Collective behavior and self-organization in neural rosette morphogenesis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Mechanocellular models of epithelial morphogenesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Naturally Engineered Maturation of Cardiomyocytes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew A WyczalkowskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Zi Chen
Benjamen A Filas
Victor D Varner
Larry A Taber
Washington University in St. Louis · USPrinceton University · US

Funding

MECHANICS OF EARLY BRAIN AND EYE DEVELOPMENTR01NS070918 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TABER, LARRY A · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Computational Modeling of Developmental ProcessesR01GM075200 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TABER, LARRY A · 2006 to 2009
$1.2M
21st-Century Imaging Sciences: Undergraduate and Graduate Student TrainingT90DA022871 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, CAROLYN J. · 2006 to 2009
$723k
Development and testing of a law for morphomechanics at multiple scalesF32GM093396 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WYCZALKOWSKI, MATTHEW A. · 2010 to 2012
$146k
NIDA NIH HHS T90 DA022871NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM093396NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075200NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the developing embryo, tissues differentiate, deform, and move in an orchestrated manner to generate various biological shapes driven by the complex interplay between genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors. Mechanics plays a key role in regulating and controlling morphogenesis, and quantitative models help us understand how various mechanical forces combine to shape the embryo. Models allow for the quantitative, unbiased testing of physical mechanisms, and when used appropriately, can motivate new experimentaldirections. This knowledge benefits biomedical researchers who aim to prevent and treat congenital malformations, as well as engineers working to create replacement tissues in the laboratory. In this review, we first give an overview of fundamental mechanical theories for morphogenesis, and then focus on models for specific processes, including pattern formation, gastrulation, neurulation, organogenesis, and wound healing. The role of mechanical feedback in development is also discussed. Finally, some perspectives aregiven on the emerging challenges in morphomechanics and mechanobiology.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationEmbryonic DevelopmentModels, BiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaChick EmbryoHumansMorphogenesis

Identifiers

PMID22692887
PMCPMC3374861
OpenAlexW2045480992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.