Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22692747›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Cross-platform analysis of HIV-1 RNA data generated by a multicenter assay validation study with wide geographic representation.

Cheryl Jennings, Brian Harty, Suzanne Granger, Carrie Wager, John A Crump, Susan A Fiscus, James W Bremer

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cheryl JenningsRush Medical College, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Chicago, Illinois, USA. cheryl_jennings@rush.edu
Brian Harty
Suzanne Granger
Carrie Wager
John A Crump
Susan A Fiscus
James W Bremer

Funding

Viral Sequencing CoreU19AI067854 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CRUMP, JOHN ANDREW · 2006 to 2011
$290.5M
International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials (IMPAACT) GroupU01AI068632 · NIAID · SOCIAL AND SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS, INC. · PI JACKSON, J BROOKS · 2006 to 2010
$109.7M
LC: HIV Prevention Trials Network - Laboratory Support for the SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Study (CoVPN 5002)UM1AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SUSAN H ESHLEMAN, Mark A Marzinke · 2011 to 2026
$100.2M
Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
HIV Prevention Trials Network: Network LaboratoryU01AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ESHLEMAN, SUSAN H · 2006 to 2010
$16.5M
Viral and Host Determinants of HIV-1 TransmissionU01AI067854 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, MYRON S · 2005 to 2005
$14.9M
HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials UnitU01AI069484 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, JOHN A · 2007 to 2011
$14.6M
VIROLOGY QUALITY ASSURANCE (VQA) PROGRAMN01AI50044 · NIAID · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BREMER, PHD, JAMES W. · 2007 to 2011
$11.9M
The Impact and Society Ecology of Bacterial Zoonoses in Northern Tanzania: UnderR01TW009237 · FIC · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CRUMP, JOHN ANDREW · 2011 to 2014
$1.7M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW009237NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI050044NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI50044NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI50410NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI067854NIAID NIH HHS U01AI067854NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068613NIAID NIH HHS U01-AI-068613NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068632NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069484NIAID NIH HHS U01AI069484NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067854NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068613NIAID NIH HHS UM1-AI-068613PHS HHS HHSN266200500044C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV-1 RNA quantitation continues to be extremely important for monitoring patients infected with HIV-1, and a number of assays have been utilized for this purpose. Differences in assay performance with respect to log(10) recovery and HIV-1 subtype specificity have been well documented for commercially available assays, although comparisons are usually limited to one or two assay platforms. Two new FDA-approved assays, the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test (RT) and the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay (AR), that utilize real-time PCR have replaced previous HIV-1 RNA platforms. Inadequate detection of some strains of HIV-1 resulted in the addition of a new primer/probe set and the introduction of a second version of the RT assay. In this study, comparisons of assay performance between the different FDA-approved HIV-1 RNA assay platforms (both new and existing) were performed by using validation data that included both well-characterized virus stock and locally collected clinical samples. Laboratories across diverse geographical regions performed the validation testing and submitted data to the Virology Quality Assurance program (VQA) for analysis. Correlation values for clinical sample testing varied across the assay platforms (r = 0.832 to 0.986), and average log(10) recoveries for HIV-1 RNA controls (compared to the nominal value) ranged from -0.215 to 0.181. These data demonstrate the need for use of one assay platform for longitudinal patient monitoring, but the data also reinforce the notion that no one assay is superior and that testing across platforms may be required for discordance reconciliation.

Indexed as

HIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralViral LoadRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID22692747
PMCPMC3421531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.