Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22692733›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Is real-time PCR better than conventional PCR for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex detection in clinical samples?

Enrico Tortoli, Pasquale Urbano, Fiorella Marcelli, Tullia M Simonetti, Daniela M Cirillo

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cysteamine/Cystamine Exert Anti-International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Enrico TortoliEmerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. e.tortoli@libero.it
Pasquale Urbano
Fiorella Marcelli
Tullia M Simonetti
Daniela M Cirillo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cobas Amplicor MTB and later Cobas TaqMan MTB were used to test a very large series of consecutive specimens received for tuberculosis diagnosis. Performance parameters were estimated and compared overall and for separate specimen categories. Both systems showed excellent specificity, and that of TaqMan was the higher. The sensitivities were similar but satisfactory only with respiratory specimens and smear-positive samples.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID22692733
PMCPMC3421539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.