Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22692377›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesiology2012

Estimation of the contribution of norketamine to ketamine-induced acute pain relief and neurocognitive impairment in healthy volunteers.

Erik Olofsen, Ingeborg Noppers, Marieke Niesters, Evan Kharasch, Leon Aarts, Elise Sarton, Albert Dahan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Effect of ECT-anesthetics on reorientation time.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Ketamine for chronic pain: risks and benefits.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014
    Review
  20. Translational PK-PD modeling in pain.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Erik OlofsenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ingeborg Noppers
Marieke Niesters
Evan Kharasch
Leon Aarts
Elise Sarton
Albert Dahan
Marymount University · USLeiden University Medical Center · NLPublic Health Dayton & Montgomery County · US

Funding

OPIOIDS IN CANCER PAIN &DRUG ABUSE--OPTIMIZING THERAPYK24DA000417 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KHARASCH, EVAN D. · 1999 to 2010
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA000417NIDA NIH HHS K24DA00417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine is metabolized in the liver into its active metabolite norketamine. No human data are available on the relative contribution of norketamine to ketamine-induced analgesia and side effects. One approach to assess the ketamine and norketamine contributions is by measuring the ketamine effect at varying ketamine and norketamine plasma concentrations using the CYP450 inducer rifampicin.

methodsIn 12 healthy male volunteers the effect of rifampicin versus placebo pretreatment on S-ketamine-induced analgesia and cognition was quantified; the S-ketamine dosage was 20 mg/h for 2 h. The relative ketamine and norketamine contribution to effect was estimated using a linear additive population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.

resultsS-ketamine produced significant analgesia, psychotropic effects (drug high), and cognitive impairment (including memory impairment and reduced psychomotor speed, reaction time, and cognitive flexibility). Modeling revealed a negative contribution of S-norketamine to S-ketamine- induced analgesia and absence of contribution to cognitive impairment. At ketamine and norketamine effect concentrations of 100 ng/ml and 50 ng/ml, respectively, the ketamine contribution to analgesia is -3.8 cm (visual analog pain score) versus a contribution of norketamine of +1.5 cm, causing an overall effect of -2.3 cm. The blood-effect site equilibration half-life ranged from 0 (cognitive flexibility) to 11.8 (pain intensity) min and was 6.1 min averaged across all endpoints.

conclusionsThis first observation that norketamine produces effects in the opposite direction of ketamine requires additional proof. It can explain the observation of ketamine-related excitatory phenomena (such as hyperalgesia and allodynia) upon the termination of ketamine infusions.

Indexed as

Acute PainAdolescentAdultAnalgesicsCognitionHot TemperatureHumansKetamineMaleMemoryPain ManagementPain MeasurementPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeReference ValuesSingle-Blind MethodAnalgesicsKetaminenorketamine

Identifiers

PMID22692377
PMCPMC3406234
OpenAlexW2010077750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.