ArticleMedical care2012
Research data collection methods: from paper to tablet computers.
Article in Medical care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Trial
- A Multifunctional, Low Cost and Sustainable Neonatal Database System.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- An Overview of Data Management in Human Subjects Research.Respiratory care · 2024Review
- Optimizing neuroscience data management by combining REDCap, BIDS and SQLite: a case study in Deep Brain Stimulation.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- Self-stigma among clients of outpatient psychiatric clinics: A cross-sectional survey.PloS one · 2022Article
- Intentional Observational Clinical Research Design: Innovative Design for Complex Clinical Research Using Advanced Technology.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Smartphone assisted oral health data recording - an android based software application development.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2021Article
- Article
- A Web-Based Mobile App (INTERACCT App) for Adolescents Undergoing Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Aftercare to Improve the Quality of Medical Information for Clinicians: Observational Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Observational
- National surveillance using mobile systems for health monitoring: complexity, functionality and feasibility.BMC infectious diseases · 2019Article
- Dynamic risk prediction for diabetes using biomarker change measurements.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Article
- Risk profiles for acute health events after incident atrial fibrillation in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2018Article
- Managing research and surveillance projects in real-time with a novel open-source eManagement tool designed for under-resourced countries.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Acceptability of a Touch Screen Tablet Psychosocial Survey Administered to Radiation Therapy Patients in Japan.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2016Article
- Feasibility of an Electronic Survey on iPads with In-Person Data Collectors for Data Collection with Health Care Professionals and Health Care Consumers in General Emergency Departments.JMIR research protocols · 2016Article
- Article
- How to Conduct Multimethod Field Studies in the Operating Room: The iPad Combined With a Survey App as a Valid and Reliable Data Collection Tool.JMIR research protocols · 2016Article
- Integrating community-based participatory research and informatics approaches to improve the engagement and health of underserved populations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Innovative tools and OpenHDS for health and demographic surveillance on Rusinga Island, Kenya.BMC research notes · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrimary data collection is a critical activity in clinical research. Even with significant advances in technical capabilities, clear benefits of use, and even user preferences for using electronic systems for collecting primary data, paper-based data collection is still common in clinical research settings. However, with recent developments in both clinical research and tablet computer technology, the comparative advantages and disadvantages of data collection methods should be determined.
objectiveTo describe case studies using multiple methods of data collection, including next-generation tablets, and consider their various advantages and disadvantages. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe reviewed 5 modern case studies using primary data collection, using methods ranging from paper to next-generation tablet computers. We performed semistructured telephone interviews with each project, which considered factors relevant to data collection. We address specific issues with workflow, implementation and security for these different methods, and identify differences in implementation that led to different technology considerations for each case study. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: There remain multiple methods for primary data collection, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Two recent methods are electronic health record templates and next-generation tablet computers. Electronic health record templates can link data directly to medical records, but are notably difficult to use. Current tablet computers are substantially different from previous technologies with regard to user familiarity and software cost. The use of cloud-based storage for tablet computers, however, creates a specific challenge for clinical research that must be considered but can be overcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22692261What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.