Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22692090›Full record

ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2012

Second-line antiretroviral therapy: long-term outcomes in South Africa.

Richard A Murphy, Henry Sunpath, Carmen Castilla, Shameez Ebrahim, Richard Court, Hoang Nguyen, Daniel Kuritzkes, Vincent C Marconi, Jean B Nachega

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Richard A Murphy *University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Henry Sunpath *Department of Medicine, McCord Hospital, Durban, South Africa.
Carmen CastillaUniversity of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
Shameez EbrahimDepartment of Medicine, McCord Hospital, Durban, South Africa.
Richard CourtUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Hoang NguyenJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Daniel KuritzkesSection of Retroviral Therapeutics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Vincent C MarconiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jean B NachegaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

The impact of HIV viral diversity and cellular immunity on HIV pathogenesisP30AI060354 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI ROBERT A. PARKER · 2004 to 2026
$94.4M
HIV-1 THERAPEUTICS AND DRUG RESISTANCEK24RR016482 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KURITZKES, DANIEL R. · 2001 to 2010
$1.0M
NCRR NIH HHS K24 RR016482NCRR NIH HHS K24-RR016482NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI060354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, boosted protease inhibitor-containing regimens are the only option after first-line regimen failure available for patients in most resource-limited settings, yet little is known about long-term adherence and outcomes.

methodsWe enrolled patients with virologic failure (VF) who initiated lopinavir/ritonavir-containing second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART). Medication possession ratios were calculated using pharmacy refill dates. Factors associated with 12-month second-line virologic suppression [viral load (VL) <50 copies/mL] and adherence were determined.

resultsOne hundred six patients (median CD4 count and VL at failure: 153 cells/mm(3) and 28,548 copies/mL, respectively) were enrolled. Adherence improved after second-line ART switch (median adherence 6 months prior, 67%; median adherence during initial 6 months of second-line ART, 100%; P = 0.001). Higher levels of adherence during second-line ART was associated with virologic suppression at month 12 of ART (odds ratio 2.5 per 10% adherence increase, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.8, P = 0.01). Time to virologic suppression was most rapid among patients with 91%-100% adherence compared with patients with 80%-90% and <80% adherence (log rank test, P = 0.01). VF during 24 months of second-line ART was moderate (month 12: 25%, n = 32/126; month 18: 21%, n = 23/112; and month 24: 25%, n = 25/99).

conclusionsThe switch to second-line ART in South Africa was associated with an improvement in adherence, however, a moderate ongoing rate of VF--among approximately 25% of patients receiving second-line ART patients at each follow-up interval--was a cause for concern. Adherence level was associated with second-line ART virologic outcome, helping explain why some patients achieved virologic suppression after switch and others did not.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveChildChild, PreschoolDrug MonitoringFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesSouth AfricaTreatment OutcomeViral LoadAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID22692090
PMCPMC3767995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.