Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22691710›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2013

Age-specific vaccine effectiveness of seasonal 2010/2011 and pandemic influenza A(H1N1) 2009 vaccines in preventing influenza in the United Kingdom.

R G Pebody, N Andrews, D M Fleming, J McMenamin, S Cottrell, B Smyth, H Durnall, C Robertson, W Carman, J Ellis and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

R G PebodyHealth Protection Agency Health Protection Services - Colindale, London, UK.
N AndrewsHealth Protection Agency Health Protection Services - Colindale, London, UK.
D M FlemingRoyal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre, Birmingham, UK.
J McMenaminHealth Protection Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
S CottrellPublic Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.
B SmythPublic Health Agency Northern Ireland, Belfast, UK.
H DurnallRoyal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre, Birmingham, UK.
C RobertsonHealth Protection Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
W CarmanWest of Scotland Specialist Virology Centre, Glasgow, UK.
J EllisHealth Protection Agency Microbiology Services - Colindale, London, UK.
P Sebastian-PillaiHealth Protection Agency Microbiology Services - Colindale, London, UK.
M ZambonHealth Protection Agency Microbiology Services - Colindale, London, UK.
C KearnsPublic Health Agency Northern Ireland, Belfast, UK.
C MoorePublic Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.
D Rh ThomasPublic Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.
J M WatsonHealth Protection Agency Health Protection Services - Colindale, London, UK.
Public Health England · GBPublic Health Wales · GBHealth Protection Agency · MVHealth Protection Scotland · GBPublic Health Agency · GBRoyal College of General Practitioners · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An analysis was undertaken to measure age-specific vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 2010/11 trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine (TIV) and monovalent 2009 pandemic influenza vaccine (PIV) administered in 2009/2010. The test-negative case-control study design was employed based on patients consulting primary care. Overall TIV effectiveness, adjusted for age and month, against confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm 2009 infection was 56% (95% CI 42-66); age-specific adjusted VE was 87% (95% CI 45-97) in <5-year-olds and 84% (95% CI 27-97) in 5- to 14-year-olds. Adjusted VE for PIV was only 28% (95% CI -6 to 51) overall and 72% (95% CI 15-91) in <5-year-olds. For confirmed influenza B infection, TIV effectiveness was 57% (95% CI 42-68) and in 5- to 14-year-olds 75% (95% CI 32-91). TIV provided moderate protection against the main circulating strains in 2010/2011, with higher protection in children. PIV administered during the previous season provided residual protection after 1 year, particularly in the <5 years age group.

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza B virusInfluenza VaccinesAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID22691710
PMCPMC9151880
OpenAlexW2128363122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.