Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22691501›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

New meta-analysis tools reveal common transcriptional regulatory basis for multiple determinants of behavior.

Seth A Ament, Charles A Blatti, Cedric Alaux, Marsha M Wheeler, Amy L Toth, Yves Le Conte, Greg J Hunt, Ernesto Guzmán-Novoa, Gloria Degrandi-Hoffman, Jose Luis Uribe-Rubio and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genes · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Behavioral genetics and genomics: Mendel's peas, mice, and bees.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessment of fight outcome is needed to activate socially driven transcriptional changes in the zebrafish brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular signatures of plastic phenotypes in two eusocial insect species with simple societies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Seth A AmentNeuroscience Program, Department of Computer Science, and Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Charles A Blatti
Cedric Alaux
Marsha M Wheeler
Amy L Toth
Yves Le Conte
Greg J Hunt
Ernesto Guzmán-Novoa
Gloria Degrandi-Hoffman
Jose Luis Uribe-Rubio
Gro V Amdam
Robert E Page
Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas
Gene E Robinson
Saurabh Sinha

Funding

Johnny Bee Good: Bees as Models to Study the Hijacking of the Reward SystemDP1OD006416 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ROBINSON, GENE E · 2009 to 2011
$2.4M
High sensitivity discovery of cis-regulatory modulesR01GM085233 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HALFON, MARC S, SINHA, SAURABH · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
Regulation of Stable Fat Loss in a Model SystemR01DK082605 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ROBINSON, GENE E · 2009 to 2010
$997k
Integration of resources and studies to elucidate neuropeptide signalingR21DA027548 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI RODRIGUEZ ZAS, SANDRA L · 2009 to 2012
$961k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA027548NIDDK NIH HHS 1R01DK082605-01A1NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK082605NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM085233-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085233NIH HHS 1DP1OD006416NIH HHS DP1 OD006416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental problem in meta-analysis is how to systematically combine information from multiple statistical tests to rigorously evaluate a single overarching hypothesis. This problem occurs in systems biology when attempting to map genomic attributes to complex phenotypes such as behavior. Behavior and other complex phenotypes are influenced by intrinsic and environmental determinants that act on the transcriptome, but little is known about how these determinants interact at the molecular level. We developed an informatic technique that identifies statistically significant meta-associations between gene expression patterns and transcription factor combinations. Deploying this technique for brain transcriptome profiles from ca. 400 individual bees, we show that diverse determinants of behavior rely on shared combinations of transcription factors. These relationships were revealed only when we considered complex and variable regulatory rules, suggesting that these shared transcription factors are used in distinct ways by different determinants. This regulatory code would have been missed by traditional gene coexpression or cis-regulatory analytic methods. We expect that our meta-analysis tools will be useful for a broad array of problems in systems biology and other fields.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalMeta-Analysis as TopicTranscription, GeneticAnimalsBeesTranscription FactorsTranscriptomeTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22691501
PMCPMC3387076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.