ReviewInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2012
In patients with carcinoid syndrome undergoing valve replacement: will a biological valve have acceptable durability?
Review in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary Carcinoid and Left-Sided Heart Disease: When Carcinoid Goes Left.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Rapid Bioprosthetic Valve Degeneration in Carcinoid Heart Disease.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Transcatheter Valve Replacement in Carcinoid Heart Disease: A Potential Change of Paradigm.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Metastatic well differentiated serotonin-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with carcinoid heart disease: a case report.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Failing stentless Bioprostheses in patients with carcinoid heart valve disease.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2015Article
- eComment. Cardiovascular surgery in carcinoid heart disease.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2012Article
- eComment. Valve replacement in carcinoid heart disease.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2012Article
- Quadruple Valve Replacement for Carcinoid Heart Disease.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgeryReview
- Valvular Disorders in Carcinoid Heart Disease.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgeryReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'In patients with carcinoid syndrome undergoing valve replacement, will a biological valve have acceptable durability?' Altogether, more than 130 papers were found using the reported search, of which 17 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. The pooled data from all papers represent 51 patients with carcinoid right heart disease who underwent tricuspid valve replacement. Two 'outcomes' studies reported a 30-day postoperative mortality of 16.7-18% and 2-year survival rates of 44 and 50%, respectively. Seventeen patients were detailed in case reports. Of these 17 patients, 7 died during the follow-up period. All but one of these patients had a normal bioprosthesis at echocardiography or at post-mortem. One patient with a plaque-covered valve had a functionally normal valve. We conclude that at present, the best available evidence suggests that although 30-day mortality approaches 20%, approximately half of patients with carcinoid syndrome undergoing tricuspid valve replacement can be expected to survive 2 years. Some patients survive considerably longer than this, beyond 10 years in some cases. Importantly, at autopsy, many replacement valves have been shown to be normal, with a few patients reported as having died of cardiac causes. This should be taken as cautious evidence that biological valves have an acceptable lifespan in patients with carcinoid syndrome and that the process of valve destruction seen in carcinoid patients does not continue to a significant level in the bioprosthesis. Caveats to this include the lack of any directly comparative trial and the predominance of case reports as opposed to higher-level evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.