Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22691240›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2012

Comparison of pharmacy-based measures of medication adherence.

William M Vollmer, Maochao Xu, Adrianne Feldstein, David Smith, Amy Waterbury, Cynthia Rand

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00414817 (Phone Calls to Promote Adherence With Inhaled Corticosteroids), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00414817 nacompletednot on this map

Phone Calls to Promote Adherence With Inhaled Corticosteroids

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2007 to 2009Enrolled14,064ConditionsAsthmaArmsAutomated Phone-Based Refill Reminders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Interventions to improve adherence to inhaled steroids for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Assessing medication adherence: options to consider.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Improving Adherence to Cardiovascular Therapies: An Economic Evaluation of a Randomized Pragmatic Trial.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
    Trial
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William M VollmerKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA. william.vollmer@kpchr.org
Maochao Xu
Adrianne Feldstein
David Smith
Amy Waterbury
Cynthia Rand

Funding

Use of Automated Phone Calls to Promote Adherence with Inhaled CorticosteroidsR01HL083433 · NHLBI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VOLLMER, WILLIAM MARION · 2006 to 2009
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL83433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacy databases are commonly used to assess medication usage, and a number of measures have been developed to measure patients' adherence to medication. An extensive literature now supports these measures, although few studies have systematically compared the properties of different adherence measures.

methodsAs part of an 18-month randomized clinical trial to assess the impact of automated telephone reminders on adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) among 6903 adult members of a managed care organization, we computed eight pharmacy-based measures of ICS adherence using outpatient pharmacy dispensing records obtained from the health plan's electronic medical record. We used simple descriptive statistics to compare the relative performance characteristics of these measures.

resultsComparative analysis found a relative upward bias in adherence estimates for those measures that require at least one dispensing event to be calculated. Measurement strategies that require a second dispensing event evidence even greater upward bias. These biases are greatest with shorter observation times. Furthermore, requiring a dispensing to be calculated meant that these measures could not be defined for large numbers of individuals (17-32 % of participants in this study). Measurement strategies that do not require a dispensing event to be calculated appear least vulnerable to these biases and can be calculated for everyone. However they do require additional assumptions and data (e.g., pre-intervention dispensing data) to support their validity.

conclusionsMany adherence measures require one, or sometimes two, dispensings in order to be defined. Since such measures assume all dispensed medication is used as directed, they have a built in upward bias that is especially pronounced when they are calculated over relatively short timeframes (< 9 months). Less biased measurement strategies that do not require a dispensing event are available, but require additional data to support their validity.

trial registrationThe study was funded by grant R01HL83433 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and is filed as study NCT00414817 in the clinicaltrials.gov database.

Indexed as

Medication AdherencePharmaceutical ServicesAdrenal Cortex HormonesAsthmaHawaiiHumansManaged Care ProgramsNorthwestern United StatesReminder SystemsAdrenal Cortex Hormones

Identifiers

PMID22691240
PMCPMC3413584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.