Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22690030›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2012

A Bayesian network approach to the study of historical epidemiological databases: modelling meningitis outbreaks in the Niger.

A Beresniak, E Bertherat, W Perea, G Soga, R Souley, D Dupont, S Hugonnet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of Models Analyzing a Small Number of Observed Meningitis Cases in Navrongo, Ghana.Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A BeresniakData Mining International, Route de l’Aeroport 29–31, CP 221, 1215 Geneva 15, Switzerland. aberesniak@datamining-international.com
E Bertherat
W Perea
G Soga
R Souley
D Dupont
S Hugonnet

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a tool for evaluating the risk that an outbreak of meningitis will occur in a particular district of the Niger after outbreaks have been reported in other, specified districts of the country.

methodsA Bayesian network was represented by a graph composed of 38 nodes (one for each district in the Niger) connected by arrows. In the graph, each node directly influenced each of the "child" nodes that lay at the ends of the arrows arising from that node, according to conditional probabilities. The probabilities between "influencing" and "influenced" districts were estimated by analysis of databases that held weekly records of meningitis outbreaks in the Niger between 1986 and 2005. For each week of interest, each district was given a Boolean-variable score of 1 (if meningitis incidence in the district reached an epidemic threshold in that week) or 0.

findingsThe Bayesian network approach provided important and original information, allowing the identification of the districts that influence meningitis risk in other districts (and the districts that are influenced by any particular district) and the evaluation of the level of influence between each pair of districts.

conclusionBayesian networks offer a promising approach to understanding the dynamics of epidemics, estimating the risk of outbreaks in particular areas and allowing control interventions to be targeted at high-risk areas.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremDatabases, FactualEpidemiologic MethodsModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsDisease OutbreaksGeographyHumansMeningitisNigerPopulation SurveillanceProbabilityRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID22690030
PMCPMC3370359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.