Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22689914›Full record

ReviewCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2012

The state of molecular biomarkers for the early detection of lung cancer.

Mohamed Hassanein, J Clay Callison, Carol Callaway-Lane, Melinda C Aldrich, Eric L Grogan, Pierre P Massion

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 214 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. BRM Promoter Polymorphisms and Survival of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in the Princess Margaret Cohort and CCTG BR.24 Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Trial
  6. Validation of the SHOX2/PTGER4 DNA Methylation Marker Panel for Plasma-Based Discrimination between Patients with Malignant and Nonmalignant Lung Disease.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2017
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. ESOMIR: a curated database of biomarker genes and miRNAs associated with esophageal cancer.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  20. Review

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed HassaneinDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville TN 37232, USA.
J Clay Callison
Carol Callaway-Lane
Melinda C Aldrich
Eric L Grogan
Pierre P Massion
VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Validation of Biomarkers of Risk for the Early Detection of Lung CancerU01CA152662 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEPPEN, STEPHEN, GROGAN, ERIC L · 2010 to 2025
$12.8M
Molecular Approaches to Early Detection of Lung CancerR01CA102353 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MASSION, PIERRE P. · 2005 to 2014
$2.4M
Decreasing Unnecessary Invasive Lung Cancer Diagnostic ProceduresIK2HX000758 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI GROGAN, ERIC L · 2014 to 2015
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX000758NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102353NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152662NCI NIH HHS U01CA152662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using biomarkers to select the most at-risk population, to detect the disease while measurable and yet not clinically apparent has been the goal of many investigations. Recent advances in molecular strategies and analytic platforms, including genomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, have identified increasing numbers of potential biomarkers in the blood, urine, exhaled breath condensate, bronchial specimens, saliva, and sputum, but none have yet moved to the clinical setting. Therefore, there is a recognized gap between the promise and the product delivery in the cancer biomarker field. In this review, we define clinical contexts where risk and diagnostic biomarkers may have use in the management of lung cancer, identify the most relevant candidate biomarkers of early detection, provide their state of development, and finally discuss critical aspects of study design in molecular biomarkers for early detection of lung cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEarly DiagnosisHumansLung NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID22689914
PMCPMC3723112
OpenAlexW2146964349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.