Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22689689›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2012

Anti-CD20 IgA can protect mice against lymphoma development: evaluation of the direct impact of IgA and cytotoxic effector recruitment on CD20 target cells.

Virginie Pascal, Brice Laffleur, Arnaud Debin, Armelle Cuvillier, Marjolein van Egmond, Daniel Drocourt, Laurent Imbertie, Céline Pangault, Karin Tarte, Gérard Tiraby and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Targeting neutrophils for cancer therapy.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. AsymmetricJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cancer immunotherapies: A hope for the uncurable?Frontiers in molecular medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Isotype selection for antibody-based cancer therapy.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. The Neutrophil: The Underdog That Packs a Punch in the Fight against Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. IgA: Structure, Function, and Developability.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Virginie PascalUniversité de Limoges, France; CNRS, Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Limoges, France.
Brice Laffleur
Arnaud Debin
Armelle Cuvillier
Marjolein van Egmond
Daniel Drocourt
Laurent Imbertie
Céline Pangault
Karin Tarte
Gérard Tiraby
Michel Cogné
InvivoGen (France) · FRUniversité de Limoges · FRÉtablissement Français du Sang · FRAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile most antibody-based therapies use IgG because of their well-known biological properties, some functional limitations of these antibodies call for the development of derivatives with other therapeutic functions. Although less abundant than IgG in serum, IgA is the most abundantly produced Ig class in humans. Besides the specific targeting of its dimeric form to mucosal areas, IgA was shown to recruit polymorphonuclear neutrophils against certain targets more efficiently than does IgG1. DESIGN AND

methodsIn this study, we investigated the various pathways by which anti-tumor effects can be mediated by anti-CD20 IgA against lymphoma cells.

resultsWe found that polymeric human IgA was significantly more effective than human IgG1 in mediating direct killing or growth inhibition of target cells in the absence of complement. We also demonstrated that this direct killing was able to indirectly induce the classical pathway of the complement cascade although to a lesser extent than direct recruitment of complement by IgG. Recruitment of the alternative complement pathway by specific IgA was also observed. In addition to activating complement for lysis of lymphoma cell lines or primary cells from patients with lymphoma, we showed that monomeric anti-CD20 IgA can effectively protect mice against tumor development in a passive immunization strategy and we demonstrated that this protective effect may be enhanced in mice expressing the human FcαRI receptor on their neutrophils.

conclusionsWe show that anti-CD20 IgA antibodies have original therapeutic properties against lymphoma cells, with strong direct effects, ability to recruit neutrophils for cell cytotoxicity and even recruitment of complement, although largely through an indirect way.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, NeoplasmAntigens, CDAntigens, CD20HumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GJurkat CellsLymphomaMiceMice, TransgenicNeutrophil InfiltrationNeutrophilsReceptors, FcAntibodies, NeoplasmAntigens, CDAntigens, CD20Fc(alpha) receptorImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GReceptors, Fc

Identifiers

PMID22689689
PMCPMC3487441
OpenAlexW2049000257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.